+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: No. 4 Receiver Question

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Salt Flat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:21 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    760
    Local Date
    04-26-2024
    Local Time
    12:35 AM

    No. 4 Receiver Question

    I hate to ask questions like this, but here goes. I picked up a dirt cheap Lithgowicon No. 4 stripped receiver at a recent gunshow. It looked great until I got home and looked at it in really good light (damn cataracts!). I could see that the receiver ring had been heated, probably to aid in barrel removal. I tried the rudimentary file hardness test and it seemed as hard as the other areas. I have just a few dollars invested so that isn't the issue, I just hate to toss an otherwise perfect receiver. Anyway would you use this receiver or toss it? Another option might be to use it for a pistol cartridge or .22?
    Salt Flat
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-13-2024 @ 05:00 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,510
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-26-2024
    Local Time
    08:35 AM
    If it really is a LKithgow No4, then it's worth a kings ranson. But presuming that it's a No1 rifle, then it's bog standard Ordnance quality steel at that point. BUT if it's been quenched, then it might have hardened or otherwise upset the structure of the steel. If it was me............ I'm thinking now........ Just get it evenly up to cherry red again and leave to cool naturally. But hopefully one of the metallurgists will chime in. Are you there JM? Bruce in Oz?

    You might find that if someones used a lot of heat to remove the barrel that they've twisted the body. Just my 2c's worth

  4. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Contributing Member muffett.2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:47 PM
    Location
    Scone, NSW. Australia
    Posts
    2,165
    Real Name
    kevin muffett
    Local Date
    04-26-2024
    Local Time
    05:35 PM
    Yep, check the body for straightness, if ok then run with it, it takes a lot of heat to change the metal structure, I doubt that this one would be any different from others I have seen that copped similar treatment.
    If the action is twisted, then that's enother story.

  7. Thank You to muffett.2008 For This Useful Post:


  8. #4
    Legacy Member Salt Flat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:21 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    760
    Local Date
    04-26-2024
    Local Time
    12:35 AM
    Thread Starter
    Oops! It’s not a Lithgowicon, it’s a Long Branch No. 4 Mk 1*. I don’t think it is twisted. I don’t see any scale on it but it turned it a little darker than the rest of the receiver. I don’t think it was quenched as the file test seems to be the same as at the rear of the receiver.

    Thanks Peter and Muffett! I started reading this forum for the Springfields but the more I see on the Lee Enfields the more hooked I am! Salt Flat.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Receiver characteristic question
    By FRA1212 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-15-2013, 12:34 PM
  2. Remington 722 Receiver question
    By RBruce in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-02-2013, 11:23 PM
  3. Inscription on Receiver Question
    By Armedoc in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-22-2011, 12:13 PM
  4. Barreled Receiver question
    By imarangemaster in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-20-2011, 08:07 AM
  5. Receiver Finish Question
    By Jughead in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-01-2009, 09:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts