Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: SVT40- accuracy controls

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Ridolpho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2022 @ 11:12 PM
    Location
    Province of Alberta, Canada
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,019
    Local Date
    05-06-2024
    Local Time
    08:27 PM

    SVT40- accuracy controls

    I'm curious about the anecdotal stories of accuracy problems including wildly errant first shot so I decided to begin a little accuracy test of my own examples. For starters I thought I'd strip each of the four and attempt to see how the action/ barrel are bedded in these refurbs. The rifles are Tulas (two 41's, one '42, and one '44). Two have the groove at top of the bolt cover and are probable original snipers. All have very well preserved metal surfaces and show signs of quality work in the refurb. To be brief, all four show consistant bedding points as shown on the photo. With the stock installed all four have significant (5 lb+) up-pressure at the tip of the stock. This pressure is either entirely on the ring in the lower metal jacket or, in one rifle, on both metal and about one inch of the wood. I don't believe the metal jacket assembly is rigid enough to impart any up-pressure at its tip but, rather, will flex as the barrel oscillates. The cleaning rod is also "along for the ride". Rearward, the barrel to barrel re-inforce are free while the receiver ring and small flat forward of the cross-pin bear on the stock. Of great interest to me, three of the four display absolutely zero longitudinal free-play of action in stock with cross-pin and trigger assembly inplace. The fourth (a non-sniper) has considerable free-play (at least 0.008") which is what I get the impression some feel could lead to the big spread between first and second shots and which could be solved with shims. To me, the biggest unknown seems to be the effect of all the junk hanging on the front of the barrel (ie. forward of the tip of the stock). These parts are probably highly variable in fit from gun to gun. So, question to the accurizing gurus out there: How well thought out is the position of the stock-end up-pressure from a barrel oscillation point of view and what approaches might be worth considering for optimizing one of these rifles? I plan to take a couple to the range this weekend to start some tests. Love the design- simple, logical.

    Ridolpho
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Ridolpho; 10-24-2013 at 11:44 PM. Reason: typo

  2. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Ridolpho For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. MKII lowers, what controls position on upper receiver?
    By c310pilot in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-18-2013, 11:18 AM
  2. Commercial controls corporation
    By Rustship in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-16-2012, 09:31 PM
  3. Tokarev SVT40
    By Jason60chev in forum Soviet Bloc Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-28-2011, 03:57 AM
  4. Commercial Controls
    By jls77 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-02-2010, 03:47 PM
  5. ammo for svt40
    By finnigan74 in forum Soviet Bloc Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-09-2010, 02:31 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts