+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Not Quite Ridgeydidge?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Contributing Member muffett.2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 05:40 AM
    Location
    Scone, NSW. Australia
    Posts
    2,166
    Real Name
    kevin muffett
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    05:50 AM

    Not Quite Ridgeydidge?

    Spotted this bit today, my immediate reaction was to scratch my head......the joys of having hair but then I began to wonder if it was a deliberate attempt to deceive........even if a poor one.
    It's marked as an unusual/rare item, as they all are.
    Attachment 53722
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to muffett.2008 For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #2
    Legacy Member Bindi2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 05:19 AM
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,447
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    03:50 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by muffett.2008 View Post
    Spotted this bit today, my immediate reaction was to scratch my head......the joys of having hair but then I began to wonder if it was a deliberate attempt to deceive........even if a poor one.
    It's marked as an unusual/rare item, as they all are.
    Attachment 53722
    Muff old mate i have 2 rifles with a MA 37 protector on them one a 1929 the other 1935. I also have one marked MA 42 on a 1941.

    More reseach needed

  5. Thank You to Bindi2 For This Useful Post:


  6. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  7. #3
    Contributing Member muffett.2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 05:40 AM
    Location
    Scone, NSW. Australia
    Posts
    2,166
    Real Name
    kevin muffett
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    05:50 AM
    Thread Starter
    Bindii, I am just going on my gut as usual, the ground face, remnants of the original stamp above the new one, the format as opposed to what I am used to, e.gAttachment 53723 the reversed comma.
    Basically, what I am getting at, is that as there was no need to remark this part as the date is irrelavent unless attached to that year rifle, as parts were often interchanged in refurb anyway, unless to deliberately deceive.
    This item is on ebay.

  8. #4
    Legacy Member Bindi2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 05:19 AM
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,447
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    03:50 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by muffett.2008 View Post
    Bindii, I am just going on my gut as usual, the ground face, remnants of the original stamp above the new one, the format as opposed to what I am used to, e.gAttachment 53723 the reversed comma.
    Basically, what I am getting at, is that as there was no need to remark this part as the date is irrelavent unless attached to that year rifle, as parts were often interchanged in refurb anyway, unless to deliberately deceive.
    This item is on ebay.
    My 42 is like yours and the 37s are the same as you showed except not polished but i need to check that again. the polish bit.

  9. #5
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    04-25-2024 @ 03:13 PM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    774
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    07:50 AM
    Both my '35s have just MA stamped on them, Bindi your MA over '41 is what i would expect, Muffs MA'37 not so much but then i don't have much experience handling inter-war Lithgows.

  10. #6
    Legacy Member Homer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:01 PM
    Posts
    658
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    05:50 AM
    I think its ok.

    Over the years Ive noted parts like sight protectors, cut-offs front bands and even front sights stamped MA37/38 but not other years. It seems someone in the production chain liked stamping the year at this time. Who knows, just an observation.

  11. Thank You to Homer For This Useful Post:


  12. #7
    Legacy Member ufo8mydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last On
    04-19-2024 @ 10:53 PM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    98
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    05:50 AM
    Another one.


  13. Thank You to ufo8mydog For This Useful Post:


  14. #8
    Contributing Member muffett.2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 05:40 AM
    Location
    Scone, NSW. Australia
    Posts
    2,166
    Real Name
    kevin muffett
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    05:50 AM
    Thread Starter
    I guess it made me pull out twenty plus rifles just to check, then go through another half dozen spare ones, sure didn't find anything like the one I originally posted.
    Apart from the Brit. ones with Broad Arrow, BSA or Enfield stamps, the early lithgows up to 1919 were all cutaways with star, the '20's were MA as were the mid 30's. 1940/41 are MA and after that the other factories.
    But I guess anythings possible, 'specially as I haven't got those vital years you blokes are sitting on.....yet.
    I just think it's a tad bogus, 70 odd years down the track on a ground surface and not showing any staining or rust, must be good stuff.

  15. #9
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    04-25-2024 @ 03:13 PM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    774
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    07:50 AM
    Excellent, something new learned today

  16. #10
    Legacy Member Homer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:01 PM
    Posts
    658
    Local Date
    05-01-2024
    Local Time
    05:50 AM
    It might have been unused muffer. i remember seeing bundles of them being sold at gunshows years ago. The style and font certainly looks like mine pictured. Had another two like it but both rifles are sold. Haven't seen it on a cocking piece before. I thought I had pictures of cut offs and front sights but can't find them now and all the rifles are gone. I did also have a 1927 Lithgowicon with MA27 on the sight protector so there seems to be no rhyme or rhythm with the date stamping. The first use of the MA stamp was 1926 according to Ian Skennertonicon and I would agree with that. I had a very good assortment of 1926/27 rifles that appeared very much unaltered and these had a mix of lithgow star and MA stamped parts such as nosecaps, trigger guards, sight protectors, sights, front bands and butt plates. One area i don't agree with Ian Skennerton is the use of knurled cocking pieces. I feel the change over from rounded style to rectangular milled on newly manufactured rifles was the same time as the MA stamp in 1926 rather than 1941.
    Last edited by Homer; 06-15-2014 at 07:51 PM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts