-
It sure looks like 11/44 to me too! I wonder if the scratchy penciller had an off day & car crashed a 'D' of the serial prefix into the second 4 of the 44? I have just this afternoon been working on an A prefix 8/44 receiver. Could the serial possibly be D 875?
If it is 11/44 it would make it a first year of production rifle, but much too late to be a prototype.
Last edited by Roger Payne; 11-05-2015 at 01:22 PM.
Reason: grammar!
-
Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:
-
11-05-2015 12:48 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
This would be a great example of a 'lost or otherwise indistinguishable' number according to the EMER management bible. Unless there was supporting documentation from the holding unit WOCS or Accountable Stores registers we'd withhold this rifle back at workshops and apply for a new 'accounting' number for it. When it came through from ACA branch (and they were quite quick) the old number would be barred through and the new identifiable number would be engraved. The rifle and supporting paperwork would go back to the unit and the paperwork would be the authority for the RQMS to amend/correct his register.
Fazakerley did this on purpose during their lifetime just to keep Field and Base workshops and Regimental Quartermasters on their toes and the ACA in being!
-
Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
-
Contributing Member
That would make sense, thanks! And the serial on the bolt was scrubbed by the Indians, right?
Would a first-year rifle make a premium in terms of value? And the Indian rework, is that also a premium, or a loss in terms of value? Or directly, how much would such a rifle bring in the UK
market?
-
Thank You to Promo For This Useful Post:
-
Many people in the UK used to shun rifles that had been to India, probably because they had generally seen very hard service & were often quite worn, & also because they were often linished of original markings & then refinished to a truly dreadful standard. However, I think things have probably improved a bit & most people I know would not reject a rifle just because it had seen Indian service, but they would want to ensure that it was in good mechanical condition & not worn out & only fit for deactivating!
-
Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
The last few Indian FTR SMLEs I have had recently have all been really good with barrels that gauged more or less as new, a few years ago they would have been hard to shift, but nowadays they seem to sell as well as any other factory names.
It used to be the same with Lithgow SMLEs & Savage No4s as well
-
-
Advisory Panel
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
-
Advisory Panel
My No 5 is also an 11/44 Fazakerley production... it has also done the tour of India. The remnants of the markings on the rifle look to me to be 11/44D875. The serial is just a little closer to the date than normal, thats all. The first line of the D mixed in with the back of the last 4 as suggested by Roger above.
Here's a pic of mine. Because the engraving is so feint, I can't get a decent pic of it. I have traced over what I could make out with the pic blown up. The serial number is in the C8600 range, so not far before the OP's rifle given that there were only 9999 for each letter prefix.... about 2200 apart.
Attachment 66996
Last edited by Son; 11-06-2015 at 01:58 AM.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Son For This Useful Post:
-
Looks like the wisdom of the crowd wins out with the original serial number being D prefix and 875. The Indians couldn't decipher it easily either so just renumbered it. Like lots of our No8's Mk5 Stens and L2A3's
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
Many thanks for the replies which allowed me to learn more of what the Indians did with the rifle, especially to Peter and Roger!
I am under the impression that the rifle in question here was probably overhauled in Indian, and afterwards being put on stock. It's still thickly covered in cosmoline, I had to clean the receiver before I was even able to take the first pictures.
And as Simon suggested, the barrel will probably gauge as new (and as we're by this topic, Peter which gauges did you use to determine the condition? Would be interested to measure this according to military standards).
Son, is your rifle also Indian renumbered? If yes, in which serial range is it?
-
-
The barrel gauges were the same as for the No4 which I'm sure have been mentioned here many times. But as I have mentioned recently, those days of ascertaining a barrels condition by what the gauges say are long gone. Now it is simply done on the CHS and the bore gauge* which on yours, the .301" plug bore gauge must run freely. Then the accuracy test which will make or break it. On No5's, loose flash eliminators were a bit of a pain too but were easily corrected
* obviously bulges, puckers, severe cuts and pitting will condemn it too
-
PM
