While MkVIIIz is a popular topic...

[Son]

I entered into a discussion elsewhere about the statement that MkVIIIz was banned from use in rifles because they blew up and started the world turning backwards (or some such tripe)
There was references to a wiki post that said MkVIIIz was 10% hotter than MkVII, had a MV of 2550fps. I looked up Mr Edwards' section in the "Lee Enfield" to see that by his notes, MkVIIIz actually had less NC in it than MkVIIz, but had the same MV at 2440fps. (top of page 594)

I did some digging and found this in the hope of getting to the bottom of the stories once and for all.... Please, all discussion and any more official documentation welcome to (hopefully) put this to bed...

From Armourers Updates 1943

Attachment 71026

Attachment 71025

I read this as saying that the use of MkVIIIz caused accelerated wear due to the difference in the shape of the projectile base causing a concentrated heat area up the boat tail out to the barrel, rather than the base of the FB projectile meeting the barrel at a tangent.... this effected already partly worn MkVII barrels more than new barrels.
The last bit says to me that MkVIIIz can be used in rifles under the same circumstances as stated for using in the LMG (Bren) and that being where less muzzle flash may be desirable on night ops.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Parashooter]

. . . I read this as saying that the use of MkVIIIz caused accelerated wear due to the difference in the shape of the projectile base causing a concentrated heat area up the boat tail out to the barrel, rather than the base of the FB projectile meeting the barrel at a tangent . . .

This seems not in agreement with the statement in the last paragraph of section 4 in the displayed document:

"* Although the use of Mark VII and kindred types of cordite loaded, flat base bulleted, ammunition reduces Mark VIIIz barrel life, the reverse is not the case." (emphasis added).

What actually may to be implied is that the accelerated erosion from cordite Mk VII ammunition can render barrels too worn to perform well with the shorter bearing surface inherent with boattail bullets of the same weight, a result easily attributable to greater opportunity for yaw in the worn throat.


Simplified sketch showing how boattails have a greater propensity for yaw in worn throats than flat base bullets.

Numerous tests over the years have demonstrated the popular idea that boattail projectiles hasten barrel wear is based more on imagination than fact. The article below summarizes some of the test results.

[CINDERS]

I have just finished a book on an Australian MG battalion based in New Guinea 42-44 they conducted a test on barrel wear and using a Vickers when they had @16,000+- the barrel was considered shot out as they could not guarantee the beaten zone for long range would not be a threat to the troops if the fire was to be close in support. From memory they may have used VIIIz they had 23,000 rounds for the test

[Lee Enfield]

[QUOTE=Son;35886
...snip...
I read this as saying that the use of MkVIIIz caused accelerated wear due to the difference in the shape of the projectile base causing a concentrated heat area up the boat tail out to the barrel, rather than the base of the FB projectile meeting the barrel at a tangent.... this effected already partly worn MkVII barrels more than new barrels.
...snip....[/QUOTE]

What your documents quite clearly say is that CORDITE propellant results in premature wear and firing even a few rounds of CORDITE ammunition results in a barrel whose accuracy life span is unpredictable and therefore restricted from overhead fire.

MK8z isn't the problem, mk7,6, tracer and AP (commonly CORDITE propellant) ect are the problem.

[Sentryduty]

This is an excellent discussion, months ago, I had conducted some informal research into this Mark 7 vs Mark 8 "machine gun" ammunition being loaded hotter and damaging Lee Enfield Rifles. I had read that Mark 8 "Vickers" ammunition was prohibited from use in rifles in a variety of places including Love and Duty, a memoir style book about the PPCLI in Korea, made reference. I took it as gospel until more recently I discovered that a large lot of IVI surplus once fired brass all featured 2008 headstamps and Mark 8Z markings, clearly from issue to the Canadian Rangers.

That sparked the question in my mind, if the Rangers have been shooting it for all these years and rifles haven't exploded, there must be something else to the Mark 7 vs Mark 8 discussion that isn't around chamber pressure. I made some private speculative conclusions about an order in the spirit of preserving "good" MG ammunition for the guns and to keep regular riflemen from wasting a precious MG asset, which became a soldier's urban legend. The "should" not fire in a rifle evolved to "shall never" fire in a rifle, because it's loaded "too hot" and will blow up / damage the rifle.

Much in the same spirit that the belief still circulates in the Canadian Infantry Corp: "You aren't allowed to sharpen your bayonet because of the Geneva convention." which is a bastardization of the Hague conventions, Section IV.3 and a 1973 report from the International Red Cross on "Weapons that may Cause Unnecessary Suffering or have Indiscriminate Effects". Neither of those documents mention bayonets, misinterpretation becomes fact, but bayonets continue to be issued with sharpening stones. I think this may be a similar case.

I do not have access to official documents, and can only regurgitate the possible misinformation of the internet, so I won't have a lot of facts to add here. However I will look for the references from Love and Duty for the interest of the forum.

[martins8589]

The Rangers use No4MKI's do they not? It is fine to shoot MK8Z in a No4 but not in a NoIMKIII SMLE. I have personally seen a SMLE that someone ignored the advice of others to not shoot MK8Z in it and it did indeed over time stretch the action.

[muffett.2008]

I gotta say, I tried some Mk.8 in my No.5, recoil was horrible and the bolt became very tight after a few rounds.
Took a bit of work to repair the sprung action and resecure the charger bridge.
So these days I steer clear of the stuff(although I will admit that when I fired the stuff, it was a red hot day and the ammo had been cooking for awhile) it was bloody good brass though, still using the cases.

[Richard Hare]

MUffet,

I used some, Kynoch, and it seemed to go alright here in the frozen North.
Have a bit of PPU I think it is. actually didn't notice much difference in my old Ishy. no sticky bolt or anything. Forget the date on that rifle now, but not a late production.

[martins8589]

The SMLE that had the stretched action never had a sticky bolt. After about 4-6 competitions of using PPU MK8Z it started spraying rounds into big groups. Upon inspection it was found the action had stretched.

[Bruce_in_Oz]

There has been a prodigious quantity of Jugo/Serbian "NNY" (PPU) Mk8 ball sprayed downrange here in Queensland alone over the last decade or so.

Reasons for its popularity?

No Mk7, Z or otherwise, to be found ANYWHERE in commercial quantities.

Reliable ignition.

Acceptable grouping from existing barrels.

That said, a Lee Enfield barrel already eroded by seventy-plus years of Mk7, will potentially have "issues" if fed a steady diet of Mk8. The gas-bleed around the boat-tail at ignition will just keep chewing out the already generous throat/ leade region.

As has also been mentioned before, swapping out an "under-performing" barrel on a Bren or Vickers is child's play compared to re-barreling a SMLE or No4.

In my mind, the obvious choice would be Mk7Z; the "magic" (flat-based) bullet driven by much cooler burning NC propellant. Most of the world's production of 7Z apparently got sprayed out of Browning aircraft guns, (less muzzle flash), or "carelessly" dropped into deep water post WW2.

Mk8 was ONLY introduced to extend the useful range of said Bren and Vickers guns, (extra distance is GOOD on the two-way rifle range), NOT to supply "match-grade" ammo to the basic foot-sloggers.