+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: US M1906 Multiball Cartridges

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    oldcorps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Last On
    08-23-2017 @ 04:58 PM
    Location
    Hillbilly Riviera
    Posts
    70
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    05:34 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks, Jim. It must be lens distortion that makes the cartridge bases appear to be a different size. In reality, the dimensions are identical and the overall length of the mystery cartridges is 2 1/2." During the 1930's both the US and Englandicon experimented with multiball cartridges and did so again in the 1950's. I suspect that these are either experimental or very limited production rounds from Frankford Arsenal. At any rate, these appear to be an updated version of the rounds briefly discussed by Brophy.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #12
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:36 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,943
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    03:34 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by oldcorps View Post
    It must be lens distortion that makes the cartridge bases appear to be a different size.
    Looks like one is closer to the lens, doesn't matter.
    Regards, Jim

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #13
    Advisory Panel green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    12-22-2023 @ 08:18 PM
    Posts
    445
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    05:34 AM
    Consensus at Intenationl Ammunition Collectors is that they are handloads.
    In Labetts two volume set on .303" and other Britishicon ammo and the HWS book I can find no mention of experimentation with multiball loads in the 30s.

  6. #14
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    oldcorps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Last On
    08-23-2017 @ 04:58 PM
    Location
    Hillbilly Riviera
    Posts
    70
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    05:34 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thank you for your opinion but that's nonsense.

  7. #15
    Advisory Panel green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    12-22-2023 @ 08:18 PM
    Posts
    445
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    05:34 AM
    I can back my "nonsense" with documentation. Please back up yours. Regards.

  8. #16
    Administrator

    Site Owner
    Badger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    75
    Posts
    12,944
    Real Name
    Doug
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    06:34 AM
    My Videos in Video Club
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by green View Post
    I can back my "nonsense" with documentation. Please back up yours. Regards.
    Although my technical knowledge level stepping into this type of discussion is basically non-existent, purely as a research and discovery tool, I would love to see documentation (or other evidence) from both sides ...

    Thanks folks...

    Regards,
    Doug

  9. #17
    Advisory Panel green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    12-22-2023 @ 08:18 PM
    Posts
    445
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    05:34 AM
    The assertion was made that in the 1930s the US and Britain experimented with multiball cartridges. I disagree.
    My documentation:
    US "History of Modern US Military Small Arms Ammunition Vol I 1880-1939." Hackley, Woodin and Scranton. This is considered the authoritative source on US ammo.
    Britain ".303 inch" and "Britishicon Small Arms Ammunition 1864-1938" Labett. Again the definitive works.
    If documentation for the above assertion is available please provide it. I have been at this for 50+ years and keep learning.

  10. Thank You to green For This Useful Post:


  11. #18
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:36 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,943
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    03:34 AM
    Well, the OP is gone and I doubt he will return... So, here's what he was working with.

    Quoting Brophy from the 1903 Springfield book, page 312, he states the Multiball Cartridge is loaded with 43 1/2 gr of powder and two round balls weighing 42 gr each. The balls are held in the case neck by a cannelure at the lower end and a crimp at the upper end. The cartridge must not be used in the magazine of the gun.

    Brophy doesn't specify who loaded this ammo or when. He gives no indication of packaging. He includes a drawing of the cartridge with measurement. So there you go, it exists...
    Regards, Jim

  12. #19
    Advisory Panel green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    12-22-2023 @ 08:18 PM
    Posts
    445
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    05:34 AM
    The ctg on pg 312 is a 30-03 not 30-06 loaded by Frankford Arsenal and discontinued in 1904. From "US Military etc" as listed above. This is a scarce ctg. No double ball 30-06 load is shown in the Brophy book.
    No equivalent was loaded by the US govt for the 30-06 ctg.
    Last edited by green; 08-24-2017 at 08:02 PM.

  13. #20
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:36 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,943
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    03:34 AM
    I guess we'll have to measure the cartridges in the pic then...for length...
    Regards, Jim

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. two WW2 cartridges
    By RCS in forum Italian Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-30-2016, 10:15 AM
  2. Some 303 cartridges
    By RCS in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-01-2014, 05:51 PM
  3. Cartridges
    By enfield303t in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-17-2012, 06:03 PM
  4. Some WW1 cartridges
    By RCS in forum Vintage Military Gear
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-15-2012, 06:24 AM
  5. some old cartridges
    By RCS in forum Martini Henry Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-28-2012, 08:34 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts