+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Any recommendations on which ammo for the T4 &.62 Nato.

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Chubbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Last On
    04-29-2024 @ 08:09 AM
    Location
    England
    Posts
    87
    Local Date
    05-02-2024
    Local Time
    07:24 PM

    Any recommendations on which ammo for the T4 &.62 Nato.

    Hi Guys

    What are people using to shoot this at 300 - 900 m's.

    Regards Chubbs
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member speckles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    02-23-2024 @ 05:42 PM
    Location
    west tn
    Posts
    180
    Real Name
    andy L
    Local Date
    05-02-2024
    Local Time
    07:24 PM
    .303. 174 gr smk projectile RL15 41.5 grains ppu brass with WLR primer

    .308 168gr smk 30 cal projectile with 42 gr of 4895 IMR WLR primer

  3. Thank You to speckles For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 11:23 AM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    7,765
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    08:24 AM
    46gns AR 2209 (Equivilents H 4350 or IMR 4350) Rem cases, Fed 210 Match, 174SMK, 3.075" COAL

  6. Thank You to CINDERS For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Legacy Member Strangely Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:31 AM
    Location
    Wiltshire UK
    Age
    72
    Posts
    553
    Real Name
    Mick Kelly
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    01:24 AM
    Given the T4 was produced in the days when barrels were designed and built for the 144 gr bullet; a good compromise is to use the 150 gr SMK with 43.9 or 44 grs of N140.
    I adopted this load after the scare mongering tactics of the NRA regarding using 155 gr in No.4 actions and their advice about getting No.4's re-proofed to 20 tons.

    I have "held the black" with this load at 1000 yards on Stickledown in the past.
    Mick

  8. Thank You to Strangely Brown For This Useful Post:


  9. #5
    Legacy Member speckles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    02-23-2024 @ 05:42 PM
    Location
    west tn
    Posts
    180
    Real Name
    andy L
    Local Date
    05-02-2024
    Local Time
    07:24 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Strangely Brown View Post
    Given the T4 was produced in the days when barrels were designed and built for the 144 gr bullet; a good compromise is to use the 150 gr SMK with 43.9 or 44 grs of N140.
    I adopted this load after the scare mongering tactics of the NRA regarding using 155 gr in No.4 actions and their advice about getting No.4's re-proofed to 20 tons.

    I have "held the black" with this load at 1000 yards on Stickledown in the past.
    Strangely brown; what are your velocities out of the muzzle with that load. If 1000 and still in the black, one would assume a very fast moving projectile

  10. #6
    Legacy Member Strangely Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:31 AM
    Location
    Wiltshire UK
    Age
    72
    Posts
    553
    Real Name
    Mick Kelly
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    01:24 AM
    I don't have a chrono speckles so I cant answer that one I'm afraid.
    All I can tell you is that was a favourite Bisley load before the switch to 155 gr bullets and the advent of rifles with forward locking lugs.

    As an aside I had a long conversation with Ted Molyneux (shot for GB in his day) who looks after the NRA museum at Bisley; he recalls a friend going over to Scandinavia in the early 1970's and importing a quantity of Raufoss 7.62mmx51 (144 gr) ammunition.
    The word was that it was supposedly very good.
    On the ammunition's first outing the scores were higher then they could ever have imagined, it then slowly dawned on them how poor the Radway Green was that they were going to have to shoot the next Imperial meeting with!
    Mick

  11. #7
    Legacy Member Chubbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Last On
    04-29-2024 @ 08:09 AM
    Location
    England
    Posts
    87
    Local Date
    05-02-2024
    Local Time
    07:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Strangely Brown View Post
    Given the T4 was produced in the days when barrels were designed and built for the 144 gr bullet; a good compromise is to use the 150 gr SMK with 43.9 or 44 grs of N140.
    I adopted this load after the scare mongering tactics of the NRA regarding using 155 gr in No.4 actions and their advice about getting No.4's re-proofed to 20 tons.

    I have "held the black" with this load at 1000 yards on Stickledown in the past.
    Hi Mick
    Are the NRA still giving this advice re the 155gr and I take it anything above.
    Regards Chubbs

  12. #8
    Legacy Member Strangely Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:31 AM
    Location
    Wiltshire UK
    Age
    72
    Posts
    553
    Real Name
    Mick Kelly
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    01:24 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Chubbs View Post
    Hi Mick
    Are the NRA still giving this advice re the 155gr and I take it anything above.
    Regards Chubbs
    Chubbs, apologies for the lateness of my reply but I don't often wander this far from the Lee Enfield forum.

    The NRA when asked for proof that 155 gr ammunition was dangerous in Lee Enfield's went to ground and realised that they actually had no proof.
    However LERA's secretary decided, (I'm TR Captain) that we ought to be responsible to our members and also to our collection of Lee Enfield Riflesicon by only firing factory made 144 gr ammunition through them.

    It's been admitted privately (so the rumours say) that somebody in the range office/NRA building went of at half cock and issued the statement without any reliable research and it was all based on hearsay.
    My take on it is an historical one, the rifles were designed for 144 gr; 150 gr works very well in the load I have mentioned above, but just how far do you push these things...?
    Mick

  13. Thank You to Strangely Brown For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 11:23 AM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    7,765
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    05-03-2024
    Local Time
    08:24 AM
    I just ran the VV N140 - 44 gn load through Quickload 3.9 I have, it gives a projected velocity of 2,701Fps out of a 25.2" Brl with a chamber pressure of 44,657Psi (Div by 2,240) or 19.936 Tons (The imperial ton is 2,240lbs the USAicon has the Short Ton which is 2,000lbs hence it is good to know both weights when calculating stuff makes a huge difference.) It is only a guide but the load is getting there.

  15. #10
    Legacy Member Chubbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Last On
    04-29-2024 @ 08:09 AM
    Location
    England
    Posts
    87
    Local Date
    05-02-2024
    Local Time
    07:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    Hi Guys

    On looking at my T4 it seems to be stamped T20 on the reciever. does this mean it was proofed at the higher pressure to comply with NRA advice. There seem to be no other markings on the barrel other than words Parker Hale LTD Birmingham Englandicon and Model T4 7.62 NATO

    Attachment 87454

    Regards Chubbs

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Book recommendations please!!!!!
    By 119er in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-18-2011, 11:07 PM
  2. SKS recommendations
    By Rick the Librarian in forum Soviet Bloc Rifles
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-04-2011, 11:29 AM
  3. Need some recommendations
    By JohnMOhio in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-30-2009, 10:13 PM
  4. Source for 7.62 NATO non magnetic milsurp ammo?
    By Swagman in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-13-2008, 09:43 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts