+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Winchester Model 1917 with very early unique serial number

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel breakeyp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last On
    03-27-2024 @ 03:29 PM
    Location
    near Detroit Michigan
    Age
    77
    Posts
    963
    Real Name
    Paul Breakey
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    01:08 AM

    Winchester Model 1917 with very early unique serial number

    Attachment 91243When production was shifted from Pattern 1914 to US Model 1917, Winchester was ahead of Remington and Eddystone in converting their production line and actually began production ahead of government acceptance. With no direction as to serial numbers, Winchester followed what they had done for the Britishicon and prefaced their serial number with a W. Of course initiative was punished and the serial method was changed. This gun is one of the last produced before the change.

    Attachment 91163Attachment 91164


    I later found this rifle, W3521, in the pile.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by breakeyp; 03-06-2018 at 02:50 PM. Reason: added additional rifle photo and comments

  2. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to breakeyp For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Legacy Member RC20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last On
    02-07-2022 @ 09:20 PM
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    316
    Local Date
    04-26-2024
    Local Time
    08:08 PM
    I would not say punished as much as they just had to change to the appearance deemed right per the US Army.

    Granted it was pretty silly, but the 1903 has a pattern they liked.

    Winchester also jumped the gun on parts conformity and got smacked a bit.

    That is more problematical to me. They needed arms in the hand of troops and I think they should have done a mark (star or astricks) to indicate not compliant and then worked to compliance.

    Despite some of the reports that not all parts ever did fully interchange, having had mix masters, they all worked fine.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Contributing Member fjruple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:25 AM
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,021
    Real Name
    Franklin Ruple
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    01:08 AM
    Thanks for the picture! Winchester got hit pretty hard on these rifles. Even to the point that General Pershing would not permit any Winchester M1917 into the AEF in Europe due the Compatibility issue since the early guns were not built to US Ordnance specification. The goal of compatiably was supposed to be achieved by January 1, 1918. The one part they could not get compatibility on was the fitting of a new firing pin due to the design of the rifle. Winchester even complained to the US Ordnance Department about the Winchester M1917 still getting a bad rep after the problem was fixed.

  6. #4
    Contributing Member Promo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,846
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    07:08 AM
    I own Winchester M1917 with serial #1xxx, it of course also has this style of marking. Yours is "quite high", compared to this. Do you know approx. when they switched to the final marking?

  7. #5
    Legacy Member Melanie_Daniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    04-24-2024 @ 01:37 PM
    Posts
    133
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    12:08 AM
    The only book I found to this serial numbers said: After 3000 rifles.

  8. #6
    Advisory Panel breakeyp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last On
    03-27-2024 @ 03:29 PM
    Location
    near Detroit Michigan
    Age
    77
    Posts
    963
    Real Name
    Paul Breakey
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    01:08 AM
    Thread Starter
    I never tracked when the W change happened, my friend of many years wrote done the number of every rifle we encountered. He has since passed on and the information lost with him.

  9. #7
    Contributing Member fjruple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:25 AM
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,021
    Real Name
    Franklin Ruple
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    01:08 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by breakeyp View Post
    I never tracked when the W change happened, my friend of many years wrote done the number of every rifle we encountered. He has since passed on and the information lost with him.
    From what I can find out there appears to a definite record of the serial numbers being stamped with the U.S.iconand W. probably up serial# 4663. In the serial number there are notes that between July 12 1917 and August 23, 1917 no new serial were recorded. However there are note to the effect "12 bodies numbered 4025 to 4036 July 20, 1917" and 15 Bodies numbered 4050 to 4065 Aug 9 1917." The notes indicates that these bodies were for experimental purposes. A rifle with 4064 appears to be an experiment with the change from the US and W to the full Winchester name as an experiment. It was another two weeks before serial numbering started back up again probably to make the new roll marking die. The serial numbering start again at 4664 on August 24, 1917 with a note. "No.17. old fashion - Last No. - from 4623 to 4663, inclusive." So, 4663 is probably the last serial number of the U.S. over the W with a number of at least one below probably more as experimentally marked WINCHESTER. But there are always one or two that goes against the grain. The information was taken from C.S. Ferris book.

  10. #8
    Contributing Member Promo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,846
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    07:08 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Melanie_Daniels View Post
    The only book I found to this serial numbers said: After 3000 rifles.
    Obviously wrong if his rifle has a serial above 4000.

  11. #9
    Legacy Member Melanie_Daniels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    04-24-2024 @ 01:37 PM
    Posts
    133
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    12:08 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Promo View Post
    Obviously wrong if his rifle has a serial above 4000.
    That`s the reason the rifle is so interesting for me.

  12. #10
    Contributing Member fjruple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:25 AM
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,021
    Real Name
    Franklin Ruple
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    01:08 AM
    General John T. Thompson who came back on active duty after working as a civilian at the Eddystone plant mandated the change to Model of M1917 and the full name of the manufacturer in a letter. I will see if I can find the letter with its date.

    --fjruple

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. British Eddystone Pattern 1914 with very early serial number
    By breakeyp in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-13-2018, 01:37 PM
  2. Winchester Carbine Serial Number Mystery
    By pickled in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-23-2013, 09:13 AM
  3. found early NS bolt with serial number
    By RCS in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-03-2012, 01:12 PM
  4. Winchester 97 serial number question
    By n64atlas in forum Military Shotguns
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-10-2010, 02:23 AM
  5. Help on Winchester serial number and correct barrel
    By maxwindage1 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-12-2009, 10:55 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts