+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Enfield P14 marking question.

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Buster95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last On
    06-14-2022 @ 03:50 PM
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    56
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    08:24 PM

    Enfield P14 marking question.

    What's the signification of a daisy flower on the bolt of an Enfield P14 made by Remington, no asterisk on the receiver. I don't have any pics, sorry.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member oldfoneguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Last On
    Today @ 02:37 PM
    Location
    long island, ny
    Posts
    561
    Real Name
    Bill
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    07:24 PM
    The daisy stamp indicates the rifle recieved a Weedon refub prior to WWII. If only one part on the rifle has it then it's a replacement part not original to the rifle. - Bill

  3. Thank You to oldfoneguy For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Ridolpho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2022 @ 11:12 PM
    Location
    Province of Alberta, Canada
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,019
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    06:24 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by oldfoneguy View Post
    The daisy stamp indicates the rifle recieved a Weedon refub prior to WWII. If only one part on the rifle has it then it's a replacement part not original to the rifle. - Bill
    I was under the impression from different sources that these stars/asterisks on different parts (including the bolt handle) only indicate manufacture as Mk I* versions. If there is no similar mark on the receiver it might be that it's an early one that escaped upgrade? Can't quite make out the serial number on the photo.

    Ridolpho

  6. #4
    Legacy Member Buster95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last On
    06-14-2022 @ 03:50 PM
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    56
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    08:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    Here are some pics of the rifle. I think the bolt has been renumbered probably long time ago.






  7. #5
    Legacy Member Buster95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last On
    06-14-2022 @ 03:50 PM
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    56
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    08:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    Serial number is 54188

  8. #6
    Legacy Member Ridolpho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2022 @ 11:12 PM
    Location
    Province of Alberta, Canada
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,019
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    06:24 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Buster95 View Post
    Serial number is 54188
    That's pretty early. The approval date for the change was Dec. 1916 but I don't know at what serial# it occured at the 3 factories. If you peruse old threads here there may be an answer. I assume that a Mk I* bolt would not work in an unmodified Mk I receiver.

    Ridolopho

  9. #7
    Legacy Member oldfoneguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Last On
    Today @ 02:37 PM
    Location
    long island, ny
    Posts
    561
    Real Name
    Bill
    Local Date
    04-30-2024
    Local Time
    07:24 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Ridolpho View Post
    That's pretty early. The approval date for the change was Dec. 1916 but I don't know at what serial# it occured at the 3 factories. If you peruse old threads here there may be an answer. I assume that a Mk I* bolt would not work in an unmodified Mk I receiver.

    Ridolopho
    Absolutely correct. Due to the longer lug length the barrel face had to be recessed to fit the MkI* spec bolt in a pre* spec receiver. There was no need to mark parts with the * marking once the change was accepted 12/16 as they were all made that way. The only reason for the marking was to let it be known that an earlier manufactured rifle was up to current spec. - BILL

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 'Z' marking on GRI Lee-Enfield No.1 Mk.3
    By CDB18 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-06-2012, 07:50 PM
  2. L4 marking question
    By Longshaor in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-20-2010, 05:11 PM
  3. PAL 10" Marking Question
    By SPEEDGUNNER in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-13-2010, 11:23 AM
  4. T38 marking question
    By Patrick Chadwick in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-22-2010, 08:35 PM
  5. Sling Well Marking Question
    By Tired Retired in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-11-2010, 10:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts