+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Another "What do I have here?" thread!

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member lawrence_n's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    04-25-2024 @ 03:40 PM
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    279
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    01:32 PM

    Another "What do I have here?" thread!

    Good day to all! I was at an estate auction and picked up a few goodies (see here and the militaria forum). I thought I was getting a Chassepot bayonet, but the script on it looks Germanic rather than Frenchicon. There's no French writing on the spine nor any visible makers mark. I've taken pics of the stamps except for the small "333" stamped on the pommel. My camera couldn't focus in on it. So my fellow blade lovers, any thoughts?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    07:32 PM

    Looks OK to me

    Well if it isn't a Chassepot bayonet, it's a remarkably good imitation!

    Seriously, I just checked your photos against my example, and stylistically it seems to match, even counting the grooves in the grips and the positions of the rivets.

    However, there are 2 differences:

    The factory script on the spine of the blade is not apparent on your example,
    My example also has what appear to be inspection marks on the curve of the quillon.

    Of course, it may be that the factory script (something like "Mre d'Armes de Chatr.." plus month and year) and the inspection marks have been worn away as a result of less than loving care over the last century and a half.

    But - as far as i can tell from your photos - it's a Chassepot bayonet. Non-matching.
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 08-03-2019 at 03:17 PM.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    07:32 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by lawrence_n View Post
    but the script on it looks Germanic rather than Frenchicon
    Sorry, don't get that. Mine looks near enough the same - for instance the flat-top "3" with a very strong curl below.

  5. #4
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    07:32 PM
    Go here to see the large number of subtle variations according to manufacturer, country, period etc.

    The 1866 Chassepot

  6. #5
    Legacy Member lawrence_n's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    04-25-2024 @ 03:40 PM
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    279
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    01:32 PM
    Thread Starter
    In doing some further research, it may be a Germanicon Werder bayonet. Note the top of the qullion and the fact that the muzzle hole has the screw on top, not the knot.
    Anyone?
    Last edited by lawrence_n; 08-03-2019 at 04:30 PM. Reason: more information

  7. #6
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    07:32 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by lawrence_n View Post
    the muzzle hole has the screw on top, not the knot.
    ??? Not sure what you mean by that.

    But I repeat. Your bayonet is - as far as I can tell from your photos - a Chassepot bayonet. The quillon/muzzle ring/screw arrangement is identical to my Chassepot bayonet.

    It is not a Werder bayonet - the grooves on the grips have a different spacing - 6 untouched rings between the rivets on the Chassepot, 5 on the Werder (at least on the photos that I can find).

    ---------- Post added at 11:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:36 PM ----------

    Furthermore, the Chassepot has a knob on the end of the quillon, the Werder does not.
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 08-03-2019 at 05:54 PM.

  8. #7
    Legacy Member lawrence_n's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    04-25-2024 @ 03:40 PM
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    279
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    01:32 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Chadwick View Post
    ??? Not sure what you mean by that.

    But I repeat. Your bayonet is - as far as I can tell from your photos - a Chassepot bayonet. The quillon/muzzle ring/screw arrangement is identical to my Chassepot bayonet.

    It is not a Werder bayonet - the grooves on the grips have a different spacing - 6 untouched rings between the rivets on the Chassepot, 5 on the Werder (at least on the photos that I can find).

    ---------- Post added at 11:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:36 PM ----------

    Furthermore, the Chassepot has a knob on the end of the quillon, the Werder does not.
    You may well be correct. I am puzzled by the lack of script on the spine of bayonet. If it was removed, it was very professionally done. Under strong magnification, there's no sign of script or abrasion. Perhaps someone can shed more light on the different stamps. Does your Chassepot bayonet have the stamps on the knob at the end of scabbard?

  9. #8
    Contributing Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:29 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,109
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    06:32 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by lawrence_n View Post
    I am puzzled by the lack of script on the spine of bayonet.
    Could you post a clear photo of the spine of the bayonet, please?

  10. #9
    Legacy Member lawrence_n's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    04-25-2024 @ 03:40 PM
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    279
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    01:32 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Flying10uk View Post
    Could you post a clear photo of the spine of the bayonet, please?
    Why? As I stated, there's nothing there, just bare steel.

  11. #10
    Contributing Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:29 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,109
    Local Date
    04-27-2024
    Local Time
    06:32 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by lawrence_n View Post
    Why? As I stated, there's nothing there, just bare steel.
    Quote Originally Posted by lawrence_n View Post
    I am puzzled by the lack of script on the spine of bayonet. If it was removed, it was very professionally done. Under strong magnification, there's no sign of script or abrasion.
    Because I wish to see the surface finish of the metal and to be given the chance to judge for myself if the spine of the bayonet has been ground/sanded off or not, to remove markings. I do have some experience of metal finishing as do some other forum members, no-doubt.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-16-2018, 10:19 AM
  2. "Non Standard" L42a1 Transit Chest (Photo Thread)
    By jmoore in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-03-2012, 03:15 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-09-2012, 04:55 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-02-2011, 08:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts