+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 43

Thread: Here's an Interesting Rifle for Discussion

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Advisory Panel
    Rick the Librarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last On
    04-09-2023 @ 08:59 PM
    Location
    NW Washington State
    Age
    74
    Posts
    2,301
    Real Name
    Rick Slater
    Local Date
    05-05-2024
    Local Time
    04:43 PM
    The first thing I noticed is that the markings on the barrel do not look like barrel markings I have seen on post-WWI '03 barrels - the lettering (both size and "font") looks different. Also, look at the "rings" on the barrel - much like a High Standard replacement. I smell a rat!
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    --George Orwell

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #12
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-24-2024 @ 03:30 PM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    61
    Posts
    3,155
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    05-05-2024
    Local Time
    05:43 PM
    ok...
    this is a turd for sure, Johnnys right, someone did the barrel and reciever, heres my take.
    the rifle was heavy buffed and blued at one time, likely semi sporterized, likely not a lownumber, they are pretty hard, and that type of engraving is tough to do on them.
    look at the cuttoff, it was buffed so hard you cant see the OFF or ON.
    parkerizing is NOT, GI. and likely a home job, very thin and blotchy.
    too light in color.
    stock has a repair at the rear tang area, that tells me, it has recoil lug issues, and was likely shot with no rear tang bushing, or a loose one.
    most stocks with this type of damage were not repaired by the military, and only replaced.
    this is not a GI repair. and a bad one at that. i dont really go over and nit pick the parts on the rifle, as its a POS.
    if it was a genuine rifle, with original finish, fair stock, ect, his starting price would be great.
    as it sits, its worth the some of the parts.
    id check the receiver with a file and see if its DHT, or NS. if its NS, it would make a shooter.
    NOT with that stock, it will need repaired correctly, before its shot again.
    step away from this one..its got issues we cant see for sure.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #13
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-24-2024 @ 03:30 PM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    61
    Posts
    3,155
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    05-05-2024
    Local Time
    05:43 PM
    oh my gawd, i just went back and looked again.
    the last picture shows a gap in the sight base, and receiver, but look at the epoxy that oozed out from the receoil lug repair..nasty nasty nasty..
    no matter what kinda bow you put on a turd, its still a turd.

  6. #14
    Contributing Member BEAR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-07-2024 @ 11:10 AM
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    682
    Real Name
    Tim Rarick
    Local Date
    05-05-2024
    Local Time
    04:43 PM

    Barrel marking comparisons

    Each barrel is 12 years apart from the subject barrel. Flaming bomb is different on all three but the subject barrel is quite a bit different.
    Oh, I just found this barrel in Brophy's book. Flaming bomb matches the 1942 barrel.
    BEAR
    Last edited by BEAR; 03-26-2009 at 01:45 PM. Reason: new picture

  7. #15
    Legacy Member Calif-Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    10-01-2023 @ 12:52 AM
    Posts
    2,508
    Local Date
    05-05-2024
    Local Time
    06:43 PM
    Serial number is quite nice, too nice? All other lettering is beat to death. A low number that has been re-numbered? Possible.

  8. #16
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Jim K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-01-2009 @ 03:41 PM
    Posts
    505
    Local Date
    05-05-2024
    Local Time
    07:43 PM
    The serial number has had the first "1" added to make it look like a high number. The SA folks took considerable pride in centering that number when they set up the jig. I don't think the number is pantographed or fake, except for that first "1". FWIW, that was quite common at one time, and that one is pretty well done compared to most.

    It looks like the receiver might even have been a salvage job; it was probably heavily rusted or even burned, then sand-blasted or wire brushed and given a dose of modern heavy Parkerizing. It could also have been a "sporterized" gun, heavily buffed and blued, then buffed again to "restore" it. The finish is not only wrong for a 1920-era rifle, it is even wrong for a WWII refinish.

    Then we have a poorly fitting stock, probably a repro, with no markings or cartouches, with what looks like a repair behind the bolt. All in all, a rifle to be avoided.

    Jim
    Last edited by Jim K; 03-26-2009 at 07:32 PM.

  9. #17
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Johnny Peppers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-01-2015 @ 11:25 PM
    Posts
    1,810
    Local Date
    05-05-2024
    Local Time
    06:43 PM
    Receiver looks original? The serial number is too low on the receiver, is running down hill, and the 3 looks like the top has been squashed down. Compare the receiver to an original receiver to see the differences.


  10. #18
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-24-2024 @ 03:30 PM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    61
    Posts
    3,155
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    05-05-2024
    Local Time
    05:43 PM
    also look at Johhnys pic real close. see how the lettering is smooth inside the stamps? a pantegraph will leave small chatter markes,
    you can use another form of engraving to get it right, but the rifle in question wasnt done that way.
    also , notice how well the sight base fits on the one Johhny has pictured? look at the one in question,,
    another side note,,,
    Johhnys rifle has no punch mark on the receiver edge, nothing to do with the other rifle, just noticed it.
    though its not on my list, id say Johhnys rifle is a NM..

  11. #19
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Phrogpilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-14-2015 @ 05:19 PM
    Location
    Pensacola, Fl
    Posts
    121
    Local Date
    05-05-2024
    Local Time
    05:43 PM
    what is "nearly 100% of original parkerized refinish"???

  12. #20
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-24-2024 @ 03:30 PM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    61
    Posts
    3,155
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    05-05-2024
    Local Time
    05:43 PM

    heres another one he has FS

    http://gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewIte...Item=125712481

    i wanna know when Winchester rebuilt 1903,s???? same lame engraving on the barrel.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Milsurp ethics, discussion
    By Sigismund in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-31-2007, 06:51 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts