I've come across a bit of an anomaly in the family of Lee Enfield.
I'm hoping some eagle-eyed type with a heap more knowledge of matters Lee Enfield will be on the ball and put me in a place of higher knowledge. Or, start a damn good Anorak-like argument about what it 'should' and 'shouldn't' be! (Just kidding, let's not get too carried away here, this is a place to learn...)
Attached is the photo on the receiver ring of a No 4 Mk 1*.
What are your thoughts as to the origin and correct description of the marking?Information
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.