-
Legacy Member
" if Stratton is correct,"
In this case, Stratton is irrelevant. I can refer you to "India's Enfields" by Robert W. Edwards.
This rifle is part of an Indian rebuild program that started in 1942. The "Z" suffix indicates it's from the first group of rifles in the program-----when they got to 99999 Z they'd move up to 00001 Y---the rebuild program ran the alphabet back to front.
All original marks would have been carefully removed with new proofs and serial number added, so there is going to be about no way to discover where or when the rifle started out. The way Assam/Burma ate up rifles in WW2, she could just as well be a 1941 Ishapore that had a very short, hard life. No way to know.
I've had several of these little beauties over the years, but none at present. They are a legitimate Ishapore rifle and a legitimate part of the larger Lee Enfield Story.
-----krinko
-
The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to krinko For This Useful Post:
-
10-01-2020 11:33 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Originally Posted by
krinko
" if Stratton is correct,"
In this case, Stratton is irrelevant. I can refer you to "India's Enfields" by Robert W. Edwards.
This rifle is part of an Indian rebuild program that started in 1942. The "Z" suffix indicates it's from the first group of rifles in the program-----when they got to 99999 Z they'd move up to 00001 Y---the rebuild program ran the alphabet back to front.
All original marks would have been carefully removed with new proofs and serial number added, so there is going to be about no way to discover where or when the rifle started out. The way Assam/Burma ate up rifles in WW2, she could just as well be a 1941 Ishapore that had a very short, hard life. No way to know.
I've had several of these little beauties over the years, but none at present. They are a legitimate Ishapore rifle and a legitimate part of the larger Lee Enfield Story.
-----krinko
That is great info. Thanks
So, My "Y" suffix (38688Y) would be what sort of date ?
Would the FTR markings be as a result of the 'rebuild programme' or would it be an additional (subsequent) rebuild / FTR ?
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
-
-
Thanks for solving the puzzle krinko. I have a copy of Edwards book........perhaps I ought to read it! Clearly, if the linishing of the old marks has been done thoroughly there is little chance of ever knowing where the rifle started life.
-
-
Contributing Member
Seems like the original poster is not that interested in the answer! Which poses the question, why ask in the first place!
However the thread is interesting to the rest of us; so thanks for posting the info!
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to 30Three For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Thanks for solving the puzzle krinko. I have a copy of Edwards book........perhaps I ought to read it!
Clearly, if the linishing of the old marks has been done thoroughly there is little chance of ever knowing where the rifle started life.
The shape of the gas vent does help (slightly) with manufacturers identification and is something not changed during FTR's
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
"So, My "Y" suffix (38688Y) would be what sort of date ?"
The FR mark on the left side of the buttsocket includes the date of the rebuild.
In your case {'46}.
The 3rd Edition of "India's Enfields" has information on this model on Page 67, kind of out of the way---but it is there.
-----krinko
-
Thank You to krinko For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
Why would Ishapore be so keen on removing prior markings in 1942? After '47 certainly one would expect it, but why before? Just to make the rifles appear "newer"? In the depths of WWII, with the Japanese in Burma?
Not saying it couldn't be of course; complacency was common enough in 1942 even.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same.
-
-
Legacy Member
"Why would Ishapore..."
The Edwards book has a fair amount of information in it but "why" is not included.
-----k.
-
Thank You to krinko For This Useful Post:
-
Must find my copy of the book to see if it sheds any light on when the Indians became so keen on linishing out the previous markings, & whether it was instituted for upgrades to a newer spec & refurbishments alike. It's not an area I commonly get involved in, but I'm sure I've seen plenty of rifles made elsewhere that have been through RFI & simply had the new markings added to the left side of the butt socket in the area below the safety spring. I wonder if there was any distinction made between specification upgrades & simple refinishing/refurbishing.......?
By chance I've just got back from buying three SMLE's this morning, one of which is a linished (RHS butt socket) & remarked (both sides of butt socket) No2 MkIV* - it is remarked just 'No2 MkIV*' on the RHS of the socket, & the RFI initials & a '1941' date on the LHS. It's got me curious now!?!
Last edited by Roger Payne; 10-04-2020 at 11:50 AM.
Reason: typo
-