What's the earliest LB No.4 Mk1* you've seen?

[Roy W]

I have just reserved LB Mk1* serial number 1L5110, which I figure must be quite a low number for the Mk1*.

What's the lowest number anyone has or has seen?

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Lee Enfield]

I have just reserved LB Mk1* serial number 1L5110, which I figure must be quite a low number for the Mk1*.

What's the lowest number anyone has or has seen?

Your rifle is serial number 15,110.

I believe 0L5 (serial no. 5) sold recently at auction

[Roy W]

Thanks. I was aware of what number mine is, I was specifically asking about the earliest Mk1* not the Mk1's.

Cheers

[Lee Enfield]

Thanks. I was aware of what number mine is, I was specifically asking about the earliest Mk1* not the Mk1's.

Cheers

You've got to be near the cross over - is the receiver date 1941 or 1942?

[Roy W]

It's 1942 marked receiver, mk 2 rear sight, square cocking piece.

It's all parkerised, so suggesting a refurb

I realise it is near the changeover, I was just wondering what the lowest number Mk1* was that anyone has or has seen.

Thanks

[Charlie]

I have 1L2158. 1941. All correct and matching with South African property marks.

[Roy W]

I have 1L2158. 1941. All correct and matching with South African property marks.

Is that a Mk1*?

If not, it isn't what I am asking
Roy

---------- Post added at 09:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:27 AM ----------

Maybe I worded this wrong, but I am asking about Mk1* rifles not Mk1's

thanks

[Lee Enfield]

Is that a Mk1*?

If not, it isn't what I am asking
Roy

---------- Post added at 09:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:27 AM ----------

Maybe I worded this wrong, but I am asking about Mk1* rifles not Mk1's

thanks

I trolled thru the stickied LB serial number thread:
highest 1941 MkI:
1L3851
1L4798
1L6926

Lowest 1942 MkI*:
1L4072
1L5979
1L6797

so there seems to have been a bit of overlap.
My understanding is that the serial number was one of the last operations (probably after fitting the bolt).

BreakeyP posted a LB with both MkI and MkI* bolt releases here a few years ago. As I recall the serial number was mid to late 1942 production.

[Roy W]

I trolled thru the stickied LB serial number thread:
highest 1941 MkI:
1L3851
1L4798
1L6926

Lowest 1942 MkI*:
1L4072
1L5979
1L6797

so there seems to have been a bit of overlap.
My understanding is that the serial number was one of the last operations (probably after fitting the bolt).

Paul Breakey posted a LB with both MkI and MkI* bolt releases here a few years ago. As I recall the serial number was mid to late 1942 production.

Thanks for that, I wonder if those numbers are correct, or people have made the same errors as they did on this thread and referred to 1's as 1*'s and vice versa?

The 1L6926 does seem very late for a Mk1.

Likewise the 1L4072 seems low for a 1*

The search continues, as they say

cheers

[5thBatt]

Thanks for that, I wonder if those numbers are correct, or people have made the same errors as they did on this thread and referred to 1's as 1*'s and vice versa?

The 1L6926 does seem very late for a Mk1.

Likewise the 1L4072 seems low for a 1*

The search continues, as they say

cheers

Savage produced over 1 million No4s during WW2. even working 24/7 from the 1st Jan 1941 to 31 Dec 1945 (5 full years) they would have to produce over 3,800 per week, so 1L4072 to 1L 6926 is less than a week of production, they would have used more than a single production line to serialize the rifles & they would have been allocated blocks of serial numbers, the rifle would not have been leaving the end of the line in a numerical order.