Flanders mud flaps, post WW1 use.

[mrclark303]

Hi all,

I came across a picture of troops training in 1938 with SMLE's, curious thing, on closer inspection, all the rifles have Flanders mud flaps fitted...

When were the flaps made obsolete?

Could it be that:

A,The picture is actually WW1, doesn't appear to be the case.

B,They are WW1 rifles from store, issued during the pre war expansion period, still fitted with flaps?

Opinions gents....

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[mrclark303]

Also noticed, the far rifle does have the transitional forend, with the volley sight dish area in evidence, suggesting a 1916/17 production rifle.

[Surpmil]

Also noticed, the far rifle does have the transitional forend, with the volley sight dish area in evidence, suggesting a 1916/17 production rifle.

And I think the rifle closest to the camera also, and what is more something I have not seen before - what looks like a patch let into the forend to eliminate the recess for the long range dial sight.

[browningautorifle]

That's either the indoor range or the classroom?

[Bob Womack]

Note that the "trainer" is about to run a model train with targets downrange! Moving target practice. How often did they have to replace cars?

Bob

[muffett.2008]

Note that the "trainer" is about to run a model train with targets downrange! Moving target practice. How often did they have to replace cars?

Bob

Bob, the train and carriages were obscured down range, only the targets were exposed.
This system was in use at Singleton in 1966/67 at 3RTB, but the system was upgraded to a full CINIE Range by the time I was back in 1970.

[browningautorifle]

system was upgraded to a full CINIE Range

We too had the CINIE target range, was quite an improvement and decent training aid. Fire a shot, target freezes and a light exposes the strike on target.

[Roger Payne]

The near rifle looks to have had a neat patch over the site of the volley sight plate (the machining for the rear volley 'arm' is still evident). I suspect it may just have been a unit that had flaps to hand & so fitted them to aid in keeping the bores free of dust/muck. But even this wouldn't have been an ideal solution; the round dimple on the Flanders Flap is of a size intended to sit in the muzzle of a 303" calibre weapon, & these, on an indoor range, are likely to be No2 MkIV*'s....aren't they?..........Odd.

[browningautorifle]

How often did they have to replace cars?

Working on a theory that I observed when teaching small arms under a SME from Warminster, the train wouldn't be shot. I see the sights are set at battle and should be set high if the small bore range was in use. The bullets go high. This is probably just learning to lead a target.

on an indoor range, are likely to be No2 MkIV*'s....aren't they?..........Odd.

I would have guess too, but perhaps just classroom instruction on "Leading targets"? I'm sure they wouldn't fire fullbore inside a building like that one?

[Alan de Enfield]

It does seem odd - I would not have though that a great number survived when records suggest that only 200,000 of the steel version were manufactured.

The 'Flanders Flap' were manufactured during 1915 by J. Purdey & Sons, A. Purdey, M. Myers & Son and Brandauer & Co.

Prices varied from 2 1/2d per 100 (or about 1p today, these were made from canvas) for 10,000 units from A. Purdey. 1/3d (6p) per 100 for 50,000 units of basic protectors from J. Purdey & Sons.

The sheet metal version War Office purchases were /|\ marked and bore the contractors name, these cost 10/- (50p) per 100 on 100,000 ordered from Brandauer and 8/-(40p) per 100 on 100,000 ordered from Myers.

The correct nomenclature was I believe "Protector, muzzle, No.3 Mark 1"