+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: My first M1917.

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member SFC Higgins's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Last On
    04-21-2024 @ 11:52 AM
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    27
    Real Name
    Rick Higgins
    Local Date
    04-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:42 AM

    My first M1917.

    Just received it today. Very nice bore for a 1918 barrel.

    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to SFC Higgins For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Contributing Member ssgross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:14 AM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,525
    Local Date
    04-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:42 AM
    great looking rifle! I bet the bore looks just as good as the outside, and shoots great. My Winchester 1917 shoots like a dream. ...if only the Brits had enough faith and confidence in the individual marksman back then to give a sight with windage in their design... It's still a lot of fun poking holes in paper.

  4. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to ssgross For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:48 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,943
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:42 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by ssgross View Post
    .if only the Brits had enough faith and confidence in the individual marksman back then to give a sight with windage in their design
    To be fair, we taught a lesson in "Aiming up and down", "Other points of aim" and "Aiming off for wind" so left and right adjustments were superfluous.
    Regards, Jim

  7. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  8. #4
    Contributing Member ssgross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:14 AM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,525
    Local Date
    04-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:42 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    so left and right adjustments were superfluous.
    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifle View Post
    To be fair
    You are very fair Jim What's the phrase? "Volley’d and thunder’d". Nevermind Tennyson was talking cannons, and we (well, certainly me) are each very biased when it comes to the various strengths/weaknesses of international perspectives on the topic, and of course the history of the same. To each their own - but I do enjoy hearing from others on the topic.

  9. Thank You to ssgross For This Useful Post:


  10. #5
    Legacy Member El Woodman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Last On
    01-01-2023 @ 07:31 PM
    Location
    SAND SPRINGS
    Age
    58
    Posts
    39
    Real Name
    Thomas Woods
    Local Date
    04-28-2024
    Local Time
    03:42 AM
    Britishicon individual riflemen were trained for 200-400 yard engagement. American riflemen were trained for longer ranges. Either way, the Europeans got a lesson about the abilities of a good rifleman......p.s. I have 2 Eddys' (1 all original 1918) and a Winchester...with JA barrels that shoot like a dream...Just not in a stiff breeze....
    Last edited by El Woodman; 10-10-2021 at 03:47 PM.

  11. #6
    Legacy Member baltimoreed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Last On
    04-21-2024 @ 11:09 PM
    Location
    Aurora, NC
    Posts
    114
    Real Name
    Ed Evans
    Local Date
    04-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:42 AM
    I might have to get me one of these cool critters. Been a big fan of Krags and 03s for years and just bought my first project enfield a few month’s ago. In researching my dispersal Mk3 project I have discovered the 1917. Sounds like a swell American milsurp. I don’t mind heavy, it can’t be any heavier than my Garandicon. And it’s in the great .30-06. Othias and Mae gave it a good rating. Maybe I’ll find one in Louisville if I don’t get one sooner.
    “Give’em hell, Pike.”

  12. Thank You to baltimoreed For This Useful Post:


  13. #7
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:48 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,943
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:42 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by baltimoreed View Post
    I don’t mind heavy, it can’t be any heavier than my Garandicon. And it’s in the great .30-06.
    About the same weight. Nice and solid on the firing point.
    Regards, Jim

  14. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  15. #8
    Contributing Member ssgross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:14 AM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,525
    Local Date
    04-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:42 AM
    For those of us that like working on these as projects, it's unfortunate that so many of these which were sporterized had the sight ears cut off.

  16. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to ssgross For This Useful Post:


  17. #9
    Legacy Member baltimoreed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Last On
    04-21-2024 @ 11:09 PM
    Location
    Aurora, NC
    Posts
    114
    Real Name
    Ed Evans
    Local Date
    04-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:42 AM
    Yes, I can’t understand why. I’m aware that its a heavy rifle but you’re not going to make it lighter by cutting those two little pieces off. Get an 03a3 to sporterize, has no ears. Of course most if not all of these milsurp sporters were done after the war, rifles were dirt cheap and extremely plentiful. Nobody thought twice about sporting them to make them handier in the deer woods.
    Last edited by baltimoreed; 07-13-2021 at 12:58 PM.
    “Give’em hell, Pike.”

  18. Thank You to baltimoreed For This Useful Post:


  19. #10
    Contributing Member ssgross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:14 AM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,525
    Local Date
    04-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:42 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by baltimoreed View Post
    Yes, I can’t understand why. I’m aware that its a heavy rifle but you’re not going to make it lighter by cutting those two little pieces off
    low scope mounts.

  20. Thank You to ssgross For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. M1917
    By TerryS in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-22-2019, 06:35 AM
  2. My first M1917's
    By sadscott in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-03-2013, 12:02 AM
  3. My 1st M1917
    By Pinmaster in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-09-2010, 06:09 PM
  4. My First M1917
    By Prince Humperdink in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-17-2009, 03:52 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts