+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 1903a4 opinions and testing photography

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Senior Member Matt Wolff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-28-2012 @ 08:39 PM
    Location
    North Shore Mass
    Posts
    189
    Local Date
    05-25-2013
    Local Time
    09:09 AM

    1903a4 opinions and testing photography

    Ok tried taking some better pics of my 03a4. SN 4992XXX all proper remington parts, refinished and blued where necisary. Wanted a shooter overall, and just looking for comments ect from the gurus.














    Last edited by Matt Wolff; 03-16-2009 at 03:09 PM. Reason: forgot a pic of mount

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    Expert gunsmithing, marksmanship training and equipment for Police, Military and Security personnel as well as for competition marksmen and hunters. William J. Ricca Surplus Sales - Dealer in U.S. parts and accessories Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Chuck in Denver ... Buy-Sell-Trade .. Guns, Cars Motorcycles Service Publications - Collectors books that earn their place in your library! Quartermaster Stores Classifieds - Click HERE to Buy & Sell Banner AD Space Available - Click HERE to Inquire Milsurps Talk Radio (Click to Listen) … Collector talk, military music & more …..
     

  3. #2
    Member Bob G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-01-2012 @ 06:38 PM
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    16
    Local Date
    05-25-2013
    Local Time
    09:09 AM
    Try to get a good shot of the bolt handle. As close as the 4th picture would be great. Great looking rifle. Have the cartouches on the stock been sanded off? I can not make them out in the last picture. The photos are nice and sharp. Good Work.
    Do it right the first time!

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Senior Member Matt Wolff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-28-2012 @ 08:39 PM
    Location
    North Shore Mass
    Posts
    189
    Local Date
    05-25-2013
    Local Time
    09:09 AM
    Thread Starter
    Only marks on the stock that can be found, is a "K" in the cutoff, rest dont know if sanded off or never there. This is the closest pics of the bolt handle I can get (my cam sucks for close up pics, and used the pics the original owner gave me) Marked 8 on top, and R on the bottom. Wood has a beautiful grain, and rifle is georgous. Just looking to see what could be wrong on it, and that could be replaced to make more correct (yes I know the scope needs to be weaver and rings parked, and barrel is replacement)









  6. #4
    Member Steve Preston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-02-2013 @ 07:32 PM
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2
    Local Date
    05-25-2013
    Local Time
    05:09 AM
    Matt, The "K" is for Keystone. It is a WW2 vintage replacement stock for the 1903A4's, and since it was a replacement it was not ever stamped with any inspection marks such as "FJA" or even the Circle "P". It was not sanded at all and is just as it was issued when it was new.

    Hope that helps you.

    Steve

  7. #5
    Member DANCESWITHEMPTIES's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    12-22-2011 @ 09:06 AM
    Location
    Eastern Ontario
    Posts
    79
    Local Date
    05-25-2013
    Local Time
    08:09 AM
    The Lyman Alaskan (M82 ?) was one of the U.S. military's alternate scopes to the Weaver M73 (commercial 330) when not available. Both were off the shelf 2.2x hunting scopes elecro penciled with Mil Spec & a serial number. Although it appears that you have a commercial version & not a military one, it was indeed one of the scopes that were used.

  8. #6
    Senior Member PeteDavis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-16-2012 @ 08:26 PM
    Location
    Mountains of old Virginia
    Posts
    101
    Local Date
    05-25-2013
    Local Time
    09:09 AM
    Nice unit.
    Mine is similar, but with the warthog stock.

    PD

  9. #7
    Senior Member Matt Wolff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-28-2012 @ 08:39 PM
    Location
    North Shore Mass
    Posts
    189
    Local Date
    05-25-2013
    Local Time
    09:09 AM
    Thread Starter
    thanks for the compliments. I know I was inquiring on another thread, but can anyone tell if the mount is a good one or not out of curiousity??

  10. #8
    Member cruiserdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-25-2013 @ 12:40 AM
    Location
    southwest desert
    Posts
    62
    Local Date
    05-25-2013
    Local Time
    06:09 AM
    The mount looks like the one on my A4 (CMPicon lottery rifle) and I think I see the appropriate shims under the front pad. Is it staked? My mount does not say Redfield on the front pad (above the serial number on the receiver ring).
    Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	03-A4-1.jpg‎
Views:	180
Size:	63.8 KB
ID:	3274  
    Last edited by cruiserdan; 03-18-2009 at 11:28 PM.
    M1 user
    NRA Endowment Member
    Parts Geek
    Land Cruiser fan

  11. #9
    Senior Member Matt Wolff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-28-2012 @ 08:39 PM
    Location
    North Shore Mass
    Posts
    189
    Local Date
    05-25-2013
    Local Time
    09:09 AM
    Thread Starter
    it is shimmed and staked. Just curious cause I had one that said simply redfield in the rear in the past, and this on says redfield and pat number in front instead. Also is square compared to commercial ones ive seen...

  12. #10
    Member cruiserdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-25-2013 @ 12:40 AM
    Location
    southwest desert
    Posts
    62
    Local Date
    05-25-2013
    Local Time
    06:09 AM
    Mine says Redfield someplace on it but I do not recall exactly where. It's burried deep in the safe and it's an adventure to tunnel in to get it out..LOL!

    I have two scopes for it, the Alaskan in the photo and an M73B1. I like to shoot it sometimes so I leave the Alaskan on it. I do not want to damage the M73B1 from the recoil.


    I think if you want a true shooter you should stick with the Alaskan. The Weavers are too delicate in my opinion.
    Last edited by cruiserdan; 03-18-2009 at 11:22 PM.
    M1 user
    NRA Endowment Member
    Parts Geek
    Land Cruiser fan

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Firearms photography
    By Rick the Librarian in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 09-20-2012, 03:12 PM
  2. Need opinions on Rock Island 1903...
    By tinbender in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-19-2009, 11:10 AM
  3. 1903a4
    By rice 123 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-13-2009, 01:08 PM
  4. Tri-Pods for Photography
    By Don W in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-11-2009, 01:48 PM
  5. Opinions Wanted: Refinishing Metal on a Steyr M95
    By SeamusMac in forum The Restorer's Corner
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-10-2009, 07:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts