Definitely a hidden agenda. The article starts off nicely enough, then becomes a vicious diatribe against the Lee Enfield. The author shows himself to be a total mammary gland on this. An email is on its way to the editor right now. The more of us write, the more chance of success (or is that too many cooks spoil the broth??). For a firearm with notorious issues and plenty of instances of life-threatening catastrophic failures, I am surprised that none of us or the Britishicon military have heard of them before.