1946 No5 MK1 Enfield

[Midmichigun]

All,
I decided to post my No5 here, to let you look it over. I purchased this a fair number of years ago from a Dunhams... it is a CAI import. The barrel is marked:No5 Mk1 303 II King.
The wood has a different stain/ lacquer on the buttstock, compared to the forend. It also has some rust and pits from its former service... and of course, the "date" is not cool compared to WWII dated rifles..... So... without further introduction...


The action cover is dated 1951.

The sling was purchased via IMA along with the action cover.
Let us start from the front...


Here we get to the wood fore end.

Rather light strike, but the SN matches the bolt and action...
Working to the magazine...

Here is the SN... notice that something has been "x'd" out... is this common?

Next is the year on the wrist....

I will reshoot if the numbers don't show up well!
Last but not least.. is the rear sight.


Now look at the markings that say No5. These look hand scribed... but I am told that this is typical... and that it is a legit "Jungle Carbine".
I am also told that the "two tone" finish on the "Jungle Carbine" is typical of carbines from the Asia area.

I look forward to any help and comments on this critter.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Anzac15]

Don't worry about the 'uncool' date on it. I find that something that just may have seen later service in some place such as say, Malaysia, is just as 'cool' as anything else. Very nice rifle.

[Beerhunter]

I find that something that just may have seen later service in some place such as say, Malaysia, is just as 'cool' as anything else.

Forgive me: Malaya. (There was no Malaysia back then.)

[spinecracker]

Yep, the British were having to deal with communists in Malaya and other places, so there is a possiblity this rifle saw action there. Very nice example. Would love to see a range report sometime

[Peter Laidler]

It definately won't have been one of ours. Stamping on the body side was taboo. Engrave, yes.........., stamp NO! The letter 'T' was allowed by previous agreement. The Malay Army Armourers were trained by us so they wouldn't do it either. It looks like the BH prefix has already been botched in a previous attempt!

[Anzac15]

Yep. My bad. Malaya.

[conec]

I've got its post-war BSA brother in it's original Suncorite finish...