+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 89

Thread: Bullet Casting Woes

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    villiers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    01-08-2017 @ 08:32 AM
    Location
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Posts
    1,084
    Real Name
    xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx
    Local Date
    05-09-2025
    Local Time
    06:31 AM
    Ok ... thanx Patrick. The old BP must have had a considerably greater volume per unit of weight than Swissicon No. 2. I was thinking of maybe using a sizer (just `cos the bullets look nicer) and then paper patching the bullets. In warm weather, the lube under the bullet really does contaminate the top layer of BP, even though I use a very thin cork patch that fits tightly between the bullet and the lube, AND between the lube and the powder. I now seat the bullets shortly before going to the range. The spread of bullet weights definitely is a b*gger.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    05-09-2025
    Local Time
    05:31 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by villiers View Post
    I now seat the bullets shortly before going to the range.

    So do I. For the very same reason. A greasy lubricant will always penetrate the wad, eventually. Pure wax would probably last a very long time, but greases have lighter fractions that soak through the wad material - quite fast in warm weather, as you have discovered.

    But what bothers me more is the variation in bullet weight you are observing. What is the variation?

    The first few casts in a session will usually show sub-optimal filling of the mould, and be underweight. The very last casts, really getting down to the bottom of the pot, will also be dubious, maybe embedding some crud off the bottom of the pot. And any flashing on the cast indicates that the mould was not quite closed, and the bullet is likely to be noticeably overweight. But the main flow should be within the sort of range I quoted. However, you must keep on casting at a steady rate, not stopping for tea and then restarting, so that the mould keeps a constant temperature. If your arms are aching and you need a break, park the mould over the melt - as close the to melt as you can get it, without dunking it. This helps to maintain a good working temperature.

    Try to pour at a constant rate, and have a similar quantity of lead as the blob on top of the cut-off plate each time , so that the final fill as the lead in the mould shrinks and draws in material from the reservoir of the blob is also fairly constant. In short, every part of the operation should be as consistent as possible.

  3. Thank You to Patrick Chadwick For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. ejection woes
    By ActionYobbo in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-17-2013, 12:28 PM
  2. lead casting
    By Pelago in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-30-2009, 10:36 AM
  3. M1917 Woes and Advice
    By Nugilum in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 06-17-2009, 11:54 PM
  4. Who is casting zinc round ball for rifle?
    By 2571 in forum Black Powder
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-29-2009, 12:17 AM
  5. More Gun Broker woes
    By RED in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-21-2009, 04:19 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts