-
Deceased August 31st, 2020
RNWMP Lee Enfield Carbine????
Last edited by englishman_ca; 08-03-2013 at 08:53 AM.
Reason: cant spel
-
-
08-03-2013 08:51 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Contributing Member
Good morning:
You are correct about the stamp. I used to own that carbine, and did mention the stamp faking to the seller--he was handling the sale of the carbine for the owner who had it after me. It's a very nice carbine, and I sometimes wish I hadn't sold it, but I have others. The stamp should be the oval one, not this half-moon, and it is clear it has been "double-struck". If memory serves me, this carbine was also issued to the Canadian
Mounted Rifles, but I could be wrong, and can't find my photos of it from when I owned it. It will be difficult to eliminate that irritating stamp without changing the stamp underneath. That is one of the reasons I sold the carbine to begin with. However, as a representative example of an LEC, it is lovely--very smooth action, nice patina. Enjoy!
Ed
-
Thank You to boltaction For This Useful Post:
-
-
Legacy Member
Viewed that gun on CGN for a few weeks, it is unfortunae the fake stamp was put on it and I gave it fairly serious thought however saw no way of removing the stamp and that ended any inclination to buy it.
It was reduced in price IIRC.
I have two, one bubba had and another that came from RCMP Depot in Regina many years ago. A retired "federal agent" owned it and was given it by the RCMP. Apparently it was used for bayonet practice by the mounties during WWI however I can't substantiate that claim.
Last edited by enfield303t; 08-03-2013 at 10:14 PM.
Reason: spelling of course
Why use a 50 pound bomb when a 500 pound bomb will do?
-
-
Legacy Member
"Apparently it was used for bayonet practice by the mounties "
I thought that the only "issue" LM/LE carbine that took a bayonet was the Royal Irish Constabulary model; these being LECs that had extra timber grafted onto the fore-end to support a LE nose-cap / bayonet standard for the P-88 bayonet.
Obviously bayonets on carbines came back into vogue with the No5, (Oz) No 6 series and the Canadian
J5550 "super-lightweight". At least they didn't bring back the outrageous Yataghan and Elcho "sword-length" bayonets for WW2, though the Oz No6 with a Patt '07 "full" length blade looks pretty wild.
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
Bruce_in_Oz
"Apparently it was used for bayonet practice by the mounties "
I thought that the only "issue" LM/LE carbine that took a bayonet was the Royal Irish Constabulary model; these being LECs that had extra timber grafted onto the fore-end to support a LE nose-cap / bayonet standard for the P-88 bayonet.
Obviously bayonets on carbines came back into vogue with the No5, (Oz) No 6 series and the
Canadian
J5550 "super-lightweight". At least they didn't bring back the outrageous Yataghan and Elcho "sword-length" bayonets for WW2, though the Oz No6 with a Patt '07 "full" length blade looks pretty wild.
Can't confirm what the guy told me and I bought it so cheap if was literally free. When I bought it I wasn't going to argue as he told me what he was told or believed he was told and i totally trust the guy.
As Peter Laidler
says, buy the gun now the story and I bought the gun, even offered him more than he asked but he was happy it was going to a good home. Also got a 1950 Long Branch No4 with transit case that appears to be unissued. He also had a No1 in .410 that was well "scorched" as I know there was a fire at the RCMP Depot in Regina years ago. I think my LEC is a little "dark" and was in the same room, just not damaged.
Why use a 50 pound bomb when a 500 pound bomb will do?
-