-
Legacy Member
-
-
07-27-2009 12:30 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Brophy states on page 48. Some Late NM hand guards had the hand guard drawing number D28179 neatly stamped into the wood. Maybe a misprint in the Poyer book.
-
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
five 0
Brophy states on page 48. Some Late NM hand guards had the hand guard drawing number D28179 neatly stamped into the wood. Maybe a misprint in the Poyer book.
You're right, appears to be a one of those dis-connects between the two references.
I keep Poyer in the garage with my work bench and Brophy in house with my La-Z-Boy. 
Since we have these pictures of "D28179" as per Brophy, I wonder if anybody out there has a "D29179" stamped handguard?
Thanks,
-
-
Advisory Panel
drawing numbered parts // 1935 to 1939..A1 or not.
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
chuckindenver
drawing numbered parts // 1935 to 1939..A1 or not.
So, are both numbers correct?
-
-
Advisory Panel
iv seen a couple different drawing numbers on Handgurds. but didnt write them down,
as far as being correct for a 1903A1? id say yes, for a 1million 4 or 1million5 serial number.
they used these as replacement parts for a while.
what i would look for, is,
late serial number range.
more parts with a drawing number. stock, handguard, rear sight base, sight asssembly, trigger, sear, cocking rod ect.
my late NM has all those parts numbered, as well as a CV marked cocking rod and trigger sear.
check you serial against SRS records, and see what comes up.
Bill Ricca has some drawing number info, maybe he can help.
-
-
Legacy Member
Its S/N# 1500307 with a barrel date of 3-38 and a C stock. No hit on SRS.
So far the major parts are tracking for a 1938 rifle using the data I have (to include Ricca). Its showing all the normal wear of a issue weapon that was carried and handled alot yet it seems to have been fired very little. Bore looks very strong and it passes the bullet test. I will headspace it after a good cleaning.
I just picked it up today. This just might be what we car crazy nuts would call a "barn find."
I will post pics later.
-
-
Legacy Member
For $550 that was a good buy on a C stocked 03. Were there any markings on the stock? The barrel does not have a turtle shape at 6 o'clock on the barrel muzzle does it?
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
five 0
For $550 that was a good buy on a C stocked 03. Were there any markings on the stock? The barrel does not have a turtle shape at 6 o'clock on the barrel muzzle does it?
Not a star gauged barrel. Has COL Samuel P. Green's inspector initials - SPG.
$550...., $550...., Who said anything about $550??????
-
-
Legacy Member
I booked marked this. http://ee.ar15.com/ItemView.aspx?iid=18361 while looking for a 03 that I could put a 1/29 barrel on. Glad someone on Jouster
's
got it. Looks like it will be a good shooter.
-