+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Early 1941 Winchester receiver with hole in top

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member RCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 09:17 AM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,334
    Real Name
    Robert Seccombe
    Local Date
    06-07-2024
    Local Time
    11:57 AM

    Early 1941 Winchester receiver with hole in top

    Photos show a early Winchester rifle that was machined too close resulting in a hole in the top under the rear sight cover area. Billy Pyle once told me that he found a 1941 Springfield receiver with the same type of hole.

    This type of machining error would not really weaken the receiver and you have to wonder if during war time such receivers might have been allowed to pass inspection ?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to RCS For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Contributing Member Tom in N.J.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 05:42 AM
    Location
    Nothern New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    605
    Local Date
    06-07-2024
    Local Time
    12:57 PM
    As that receiver has the logo and serial number applied, it had passed most of the inspections for acceptance. Manufactures want to junk or scrap items prior to a serial number being assigned for budget / accounting reasons. The only work to be done after marking is de-burr, heat treat and finish. M1icon receivers that are removed for a defect and sent back for repair or salvage account for the rifles where the serial number is too late for the revision number or heat lot code. A rejected item pending repair could be a "door stop" until enough of them are gathered to make the set-up and repair to salvage economical. Winchester being a commercial firm went out of their way to savage and reduce the cost of scrap. The vast majority of WRA receiver are of the -2 drawing with the other being the late -WIN 13. I had a WRA M1 -2 rifle with a chrome plated receiver face and a copper washer to save the receiver and allow barrel installation.

  4. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Tom in N.J. For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Legacy Member cpc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last On
    06-04-2024 @ 05:50 PM
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    103
    Local Date
    06-07-2024
    Local Time
    12:57 PM
    Tom,
    Do you think WRA chromed the face or do you think that was done later at an ordnance depot to salvage the receiver? While it was a practice to do that on some parts you don’t see many receivers around any more that have that modification.
    Regards,
    CC
    [QUOTE by=Tom in N.J.;517364]As that receiver has the logo and serial number applied, it had passed most of the inspections for acceptance. Manufactures want to junk or scrap items prior to a serial number being assigned for budget / accounting reasons. The only work to be done after marking is de-burr, heat treat and finish. M1icon receivers that are removed for a defect and sent back for repair or salvage account for the rifles where the serial number is too late for the revision number or heat lot code. A rejected item pending repair could be a "door stop" until enough of them are gathered to make the set-up and repair to salvage economical. Winchester being a commercial firm went out of their way to savage and reduce the cost of scrap. The vast majority of WRA receiver are of the -2 drawing with the other being the late -WIN 13. I had a WRA M1 -2 rifle with a chrome plated receiver face and a copper washer to save the receiver and allow barrel installation.[/QUOTE]

  7. #4
    Contributing Member Bob Seijas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 11:10 AM
    Location
    Montville, NJ and Delray Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,227
    Real Name
    Bob Seijas
    Local Date
    06-07-2024
    Local Time
    12:57 PM

    Failed Parts

    All makers set aside parts that did not meet all the specs but would still function... they had to apply to Ordnance for special permission to use them. It was usually granted.
    Real men measure once and cut.

  8. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Bob Seijas For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. early 1941 production Winchester M1 rifle stock
    By RCS in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-17-2018, 04:37 PM
  2. interesting receiver markings on early receiver
    By RCS in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-04-2017, 08:38 PM
  3. Strange hole in upper handguard of early 1903
    By jrapose in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-02-2016, 05:48 PM
  4. Need a hole in a receiver filled
    By pastprime in forum The Restorer's Corner
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-09-2014, 06:30 PM
  5. Drill hole on receiver ring of M'1917 ??
    By Kri4h in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-10-2012, 09:46 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts