+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: New Bolt and Headspace

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Rustship's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    Today @ 03:43 PM
    Location
    Spring, TX
    Age
    72
    Posts
    526
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    08:40 PM

    New Bolt and Headspace

    Just curious, since all parts are mil-spec, how many of you guys have bought new bolt and found that the headspace changed. Is this something to absolutely, postively check? or can you slap any bolt in and go. I'm sure this is something the military thought of in developement. Is there a lot of variations between all of the makers bolts? Just something that came across my tired old mind today,
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Deceased 45B20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    11-27-2011 @ 08:19 PM
    Posts
    88
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    05:40 PM
    Rustship

    I have checked a lot of Carbine’s (M1icon&2) headspace and changed a number of barrels, mostly taken off other Carbines but a few were new barrels, I found the variations in headspace varied more with the Carbine than with the M1 Rifle. However I found very few Carbines that would not pass the headspace test (not close on the 1.302” Gage) with switching bolts. I was always lucky in having a good number of spare bolts, a lot new. Even when a Field Test Bolt closed on the 1.302”, I could almost always find a bolt that would not close on the 1.302” gauge. These were ARVN’s Carbines, different set of rules. And no,, I did not note which manufacturers fit best or try to match manufacturer to manufacture. At the time (1967 to 1968) I was only vaguely aware of what the different marks meant.

    Pre 1969 there was a requirement that all re-barreled Carbines must not close on the 1.295” Gage and no Carbine that closed on the 1.298” Gage could be returned to stock, it had to be ‘evacuated’ (sent) to a Depot or a Fifth Echelon Rebuild Facility. Some time after TM 9-1276, Feb 53, was issued (released) these requirement were changed. I do not have these Changes, but I remember them and the only headspace requirement was that the bolt not close on the 1.302” at any level of Maintenance. TM 9-1005-210-35, dated June 69 only list one Headspace Gage, the 1.302”.

    I guess the 1.290” would be the same as a GO and the 1.302” a FIELD REJECT but I only remember referring to them by their size.

    45B20
    Last edited by 45B20; 04-02-2010 at 07:12 PM.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Rustship's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    Today @ 03:43 PM
    Location
    Spring, TX
    Age
    72
    Posts
    526
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    08:40 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thankd 45B20, Now that you bring up that 1.302 measurement, I have seen field guages that have that measurement which is different than the No-Go, and Go guage. So I guess there is some forgiving thousands there. I would guess the 1.302 is the extreme, for wartime (shoot it until this dont work) measurement). I would think back in the day, a solder whould go to the company gunsmith if he had broken a part such as an extractor, and say give me a new bolt, put it in and go back to the line.

  6. #4
    Deceased 45B20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    11-27-2011 @ 08:19 PM
    Posts
    88
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    05:40 PM
    Rustship

    The headspace specifications have changed over the years. To call a 1.302” Gage a “extreme for war time” would be incorrect. It was simply the gage that determents if a Carbine is serviceable or not, at that period of time. In 1947 closing on a 1.300” Gage would make it unserviceable, in 1954 closing on a 1.302”Gage would make a Carbine unserviceable. The TM in force at the time, determined what the specs for any particular Small Arm was. Ordnance changed specifications as they gained experience and data on a weapon. There were no ‘War Time’ head space specs on any US Small Arms.

    There was really no company gunsmith, there was a Company Armorer,, who was not trained or authorized to order and/or change bolts and he had no Headspace Gages. Not saying he could not acquire the odd bolt or two, but it would be very difficult for him to have Headspace Gages. And I see no reason why he should. During combat there is regrettably extra weapons laying around, especially at an Aid Station. If a weapon does fail, the Company Supply Room/tent (of which the Armorer is part) has a float of extra Individual Weapons which would be issued to replace the faulty weapon. The Armorer could repair some problems, but if the fault was beyond his authorization to repair, he would then sent the faulty weapon to the Direct Support (3rd echelon) unit supporting him or call for their Contact Team to come to his location.

    During a war, the Company Armorer in a very busy individual, he has a lot of supply reasonabilities, he does not need any more to do.

    45B20

  7. #5
    Legacy Member Rustship's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    Today @ 03:43 PM
    Location
    Spring, TX
    Age
    72
    Posts
    526
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    08:40 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks 45B20,

    You guys are smart, keeps me from having to look stuff up. I appreciate the info, because a gunsmith I am not.

  8. #6
    Legacy Member hammonje's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-11-2021 @ 04:17 PM
    Location
    Union, KY
    Age
    50
    Posts
    24
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    09:40 PM
    Found a few that would close on a field gauge. Winchester bolt looked like new with 95% green park and the barrel gauged TE=2.0. The original Inland round bolt would not close on the no-go gauge and closed on the go gauge. That's why you check the headspace. You cannot just swap bolts. Better to spend the $75 on a set of gauges. They are nice to have when buying a carbine FTF since you can make sure it headspaces correctly and is not some mixmaster of junk parts someone put together.

  9. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to hammonje For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ulflyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-31-2015 @ 05:46 PM
    Location
    nc
    Posts
    165
    Local Date
    06-17-2024
    Local Time
    09:40 PM
    Rustship: I dont' claim to very knowledgable about this subject, but in the last two years, out of 20 CMPicon carbines that I have done some "restoring" on and changed bolts, only two did not guage right, using a field guage. In each case, by swapping bolts, I found a fit for each bolt. Both of the guns and bolts were Inland, but probably only because thats the make I have the most of.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Garand - change bolt - change headspace?
    By Scott2K in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-11-2011, 01:06 PM
  2. Change bolt - change headspace?
    By Scott2K in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-22-2009, 11:04 AM
  3. Bolt number/headspace length list
    By ralfus in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-27-2009, 02:20 PM
  4. Bolt Release lever or do you rotate the bolt head?
    By Williamb in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-05-2009, 01:04 PM
  5. headspace?
    By rifleman7mm in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-30-2007, 10:52 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts