Gunbroker S.G. opinions?

[Maniac]

The rear sight is a reproduction and that is more then enough to steer clear of it. This seller seems to come up with quite a few of these of late as well as some of the more desireable parts. At one time he was selling stripped receivers if I remember correctly. Could be an East Coast version of George maybe.

Maybe he's just being really honest about the S.G., here's one definition of incredible:

in·cred·i·ble
Pronunciation: in-ˈkre-də-bəl
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin incredibilis, from in- + credibilis credible
Date: 15th century

1 : too extraordinary and improbable to be believed

East coast George? Maybe so, from what I understand, George mixes it up with real and humped parts. The higher-end the part, the more apt it is to be fake.

[FTD1167]

You could buy 5 service grade Inlands and a box of Ammo from the CMP for that price..

[Curt]

The front band looks to nice perfect and shiny smooth black.

[Bill Hollinger]

The rear sight is fake and wrong for an SG and stake marks are visible, the band is fake, sear looks like a Winchester, the mag release stampings look fake, the butt plate is not correct, the stock stamping look suspect, the RSG on the hand guard looks suspect, bolt should be blued and is parked over the pitting, the stock, although a high wood, does not look GI to me, front sight has been off a few times,......whew, gotta take a breath! All this and the photo quality sucks, why? So you don't get a really good look at it.

On the good side the seller offers a no questions asked money back guarantee. IMHO