+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 106

Thread: M1 Carbine in an intermediate caliber

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #41
    Legacy Member floydthecat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Last On
    04-18-2024 @ 08:34 PM
    Location
    Southeastern US
    Posts
    166
    Local Date
    06-08-2024
    Local Time
    04:00 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by jakester View Post
    The biggest problem with most of the many cartridge variants that M1icon carbines had been converted to over the years, was finding one that actually provided a ballistic advantage over the .30 carbine round while confined to the Carbines 40,000 cup max operating pressure. Very few cartridges performed better within this limitation when compared to the M1 Carbines original performance requirements.
    This...this is the main reason along with action length that it seems futile to try and make the 7.62x33 something better. However, you can convert to the .355 family of pistol cartridges. You won't gain any performance over the 7.62 x33, but from an 18-inch barrel at ranges out to 100-yards....the 9x19 will do anything the 7.62x33 will do. All you need is a barrel and they are available at reasonable cost. Some light machining is required on the piston, nut, and bolt-face, but it remains a 100% gas-operated USGI carbine. Marlin and Ruger make a pretty good camp carbine, but lug one around all day and you will appreciate the feeling of packing something more closely related to a 10/22.

  2. Thank You to floydthecat For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #42
    Legacy Member RCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 01:01 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,334
    Real Name
    Robert Seccombe
    Local Date
    06-08-2024
    Local Time
    05:00 AM

    another caliber for the M1 carbine

    I always wonder if US Ordnance gave any thought to the Winchester 35 Self loading Cartridge for the carbine, they did use the smaller brother, the 32 WSL cartridge. With a 150 gr bullet these fit right into a carbine magazine. this 35 WSL is nothing more than a rimless 38 special case (like the 38 AMU pistol cartridge) plus you can still get a good velocity with a heavy 35 cal bullet

  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #43
    Legacy Member floydthecat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Last On
    04-18-2024 @ 08:34 PM
    Location
    Southeastern US
    Posts
    166
    Local Date
    06-08-2024
    Local Time
    04:00 AM
    Not sure what pressures are generated by the 35WSL. 35,000 psi is about the bottom end of what is needed for cycling and the 9mm barely meets that.

    Heavy 9mm slugs in the 145-grain range actually cycle better than 115-grain loads.

    Rimless .357 magnum would likely run, which would almost be a 9mm magnum that does run well in conversions.
    Last edited by floydthecat; 12-28-2021 at 03:49 PM.

  7. #44
    Legacy Member lboos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-18-2023 @ 03:52 PM
    Location
    GA.
    Posts
    422
    Real Name
    Louis Boos
    Local Date
    06-08-2024
    Local Time
    06:00 AM
    delete.
    Last edited by lboos; 12-28-2021 at 02:13 PM.

  8. #45
    Contributing Member eb in oregon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:05 AM
    Location
    Northern Oregon
    Posts
    194
    Real Name
    Eric
    Local Date
    06-08-2024
    Local Time
    03:00 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by RCS View Post
    I always wonder if US Ordnance gave any thought to the Winchester 35 Self loading Cartridge for the carbine, they did use the smaller brother, the 32 WSL cartridge. With a 150 gr bullet these fit right into a carbine magazine. this 35 WSL is nothing more than a rimless 38 special case (like the 38 AMU pistol cartridge) plus you can still get a good velocity with a heavy 35 cal bulletAttachment 122613
    So we had 30.06 and .45ACP as standard infantry calibers. You really think it beneficial to adopt a third completely different caliber along with the related tooling required during a time of war?
    Last edited by eb in oregon; 12-28-2021 at 03:43 PM.
    "You are what you do when it counts."

  9. #46
    Legacy Member floydthecat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Last On
    04-18-2024 @ 08:34 PM
    Location
    Southeastern US
    Posts
    166
    Local Date
    06-08-2024
    Local Time
    04:00 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by eb in oregon View Post
    So we had 30.06 and .45ACP as standard infantry calibers. You really think it beneficial to adopt a third caliber along with the related tooling required during a time of war?
    That was a common string of thought and I understand the .276 was shot down for that reason, but they went against that thought of caliber commonality when they chose the 7.62x33 round for the carbine anyway……a third caliber.

  10. #47
    Contributing Member eb in oregon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:05 AM
    Location
    Northern Oregon
    Posts
    194
    Real Name
    Eric
    Local Date
    06-08-2024
    Local Time
    03:00 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by flydthecat View Post
    That was a common string of thought and I understand the .276 was shot down for that reason, but they went against that thought of caliber commonality when they chose the 7.62x33 round for the carbine anyway……a third caliber.
    A third cartridge, not a third caliber and diameter. When the specifications for a new Carbine were released for development .30 caliber was specifically required due to the issues of tooling and some commonality. McArthur personally "shot down" the .276 specifically due to the millions of 30.06 already in inventory.
    "You are what you do when it counts."

  11. #48
    Contributing Member mrclark303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 03:37 PM
    Location
    The wild west of England
    Posts
    3,410
    Real Name
    Mr Clark
    Local Date
    06-08-2024
    Local Time
    11:00 AM
    Thread Starter
    Hi all, I just wanted to thank everyone for their input in this thread. It's opened a whole new world of wildcat cartridges for me to study!

  12. #49
    Legacy Member floydthecat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Last On
    04-18-2024 @ 08:34 PM
    Location
    Southeastern US
    Posts
    166
    Local Date
    06-08-2024
    Local Time
    04:00 AM
    I luv the little gun for what it is, not because it shoots 7.62x33. Several other calibers are available for conversion that will not seriously alter the action. 30-carbine at a dollar a round might be reason enough to seek an alternative.

  13. #50
    Contributing Member eb in oregon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:05 AM
    Location
    Northern Oregon
    Posts
    194
    Real Name
    Eric
    Local Date
    06-08-2024
    Local Time
    03:00 AM
    Merely an opinion, but if a person want's to "poop up" a .30 Carbine they are better going down in diameter than a larger diameter. 5.7MMJ does very well out to 250 yards, requires little alteration of the original rifle, and delivers a 40 grain projectile at 2800 to 3000 fps. It is far superior to 5.7x28, though not hardly a pistol cartridge of any sort.

    http://johnsonautomatics.com/message...bd5072a985.JPG
    "You are what you do when it counts."

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-09-2017, 04:35 PM
  2. Intermediate mauser sniper?
    By chainsaw in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-21-2012, 11:57 AM
  3. sub caliber or chamber inserts or auxilary caliber
    By RCS in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-08-2011, 09:42 PM
  4. Intermediate Enfield Brens
    By Peter Laidler in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-31-2009, 12:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts