1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member ghost07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last On
    12-29-2023 @ 11:00 AM
    Location
    Fisherville, KY
    Posts
    14
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    01:00 PM

    Opinions please on this Remington 1903-A4

    I recently purchased this block 1 1903-A4 sn 3124806 with a barred date of 9/43. I would greatly appreciate your comments on its authenticity and condition. I have used Pryor’s book Collecting the American Sniper Rifle 1900 to 1945 as my main reference. Based on the book it appears that the receiver, bolt, stock, barrel, trigger guard and butt plate are correct. I have not disassembled it yet to get a complete picture of it. The only thing I have found which does not look completely correct is the scope. The adjusting plate on my scope is marked Telescope M73B1, Stock NO. 7579931, Serial NO. Blank, 7635029. On the right side of the scope is Serial No. and in electro pencil “34149”. According to Pryor this is the correct scope for a Block 3 rifle. I requested and obtained a letter from CMPicon stating that this rifle was sold at their online auction on September 14, 2004. I believe that would explain the sight difference because I don’t believe sniper rifles sold by CMP included scopes. I asked my gunsmith to take a good look at it and he believes it has been shot very little. This is based on both the condition of the stock and action, especially the cartouches, and the fact that he found some cosmolineicon in the receiver, scope mount and the area between the bottom of the folllower spring and floor plate was full of cosmoline. Finally there is no arsenal mark on the left side of the butt stock and only a single “P” proof on the bottom of the stock which should indicate it has never been rearsenaled. Thank you for you information and comments. Nothing is better than hearing the people who know.

    Larry Muench
    Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0483.jpeg‎
Views:	234
Size:	1.42 MB
ID:	133547   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0485.jpeg‎
Views:	180
Size:	1.33 MB
ID:	133548   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0486.jpeg‎
Views:	175
Size:	810.0 KB
ID:	133549   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0487.jpeg‎
Views:	174
Size:	795.2 KB
ID:	133550   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0488.jpeg‎
Views:	169
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	133551   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0489.jpeg‎
Views:	78
Size:	973.1 KB
ID:	133552   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0490.jpeg‎
Views:	77
Size:	1.76 MB
ID:	133553  

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0491.jpeg‎
Views:	89
Size:	1.48 MB
ID:	133554   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0493.jpeg‎
Views:	94
Size:	1.56 MB
ID:	133555   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0494.jpeg‎
Views:	91
Size:	1.37 MB
ID:	133556   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0496.jpeg‎
Views:	90
Size:	1.17 MB
ID:	133557   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0497.jpeg‎
Views:	90
Size:	1.78 MB
ID:	133558   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0498.jpeg‎
Views:	91
Size:	1.33 MB
ID:	133559   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0499.jpeg‎
Views:	92
Size:	1.64 MB
ID:	133560  

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0500.jpeg‎
Views:	87
Size:	1.65 MB
ID:	133561   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0501.jpeg‎
Views:	92
Size:	1.44 MB
ID:	133562   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0502.jpeg‎
Views:	95
Size:	1.56 MB
ID:	133563  

  2. Thank You to ghost07 For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Advisory Panel John Beard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    05-13-2024 @ 12:48 AM
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    1,066
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    01:00 PM
    First of all, the serial number you posted is not an M'03-A4 serial number. The inspection stamps in your rifle's stock appear to be fake. I can assure you that the CMPicon does not apply fake inspection stamps. Also, I see no evidence of shims under the front scope mount base. And finally, I concur that the telescope appears to be a later model scope based on the markings.

    J.B.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Contributing Member ghost07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last On
    12-29-2023 @ 11:00 AM
    Location
    Fisherville, KY
    Posts
    14
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    01:00 PM
    Thread Starter
    John my sincere apologies. I entered a wrong serial number. It’s 3423806 which is a Block 1 serial number. Thanks

  6. #4
    Legacy Member Salt Flat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 12:32 AM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    761
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:00 AM
    Hi Ghost07, Can you show us a picture of the "U.S. REMINGTON and MODEL 03-A3" markings?
    Also a picture of the serial number.
    Last edited by Salt Flat; 10-26-2023 at 03:05 PM.

  7. #5
    Contributing Member ghost07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last On
    12-29-2023 @ 11:00 AM
    Location
    Fisherville, KY
    Posts
    14
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    01:00 PM
    Thread Starter

    Pictures for Salt Flat

    Thank you for looking. Here are the pictures you requested. Please let me know if you need anything else.

    Larry
    Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0509.jpeg‎
Views:	117
Size:	1.60 MB
ID:	133571   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0507.jpeg‎
Views:	122
Size:	1.48 MB
ID:	133572  

  8. Thank You to ghost07 For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-24-2024 @ 03:30 PM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    61
    Posts
    3,155
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    12:00 PM
    receiver is genuine, thats were it ends, scope is not genuine, bolt is not genuine, stock is very suspect, at least the markings are.
    Last edited by Chuckindenver; 10-26-2023 at 06:24 PM.
    warpath metal finishing contact info.
    molinenorski@msn.com
    720-841-1399 during normal bus, hours.

  10. #7
    Legacy Member Salt Flat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 12:32 AM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    761
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:00 AM
    Hey Ghost07 -- Thanks for posting the pictures. I agree with Chuck. The receiver markings look genuine. We have seen some that were very crudely faked. Salt Flat

  11. #8
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-24-2024 @ 03:30 PM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    61
    Posts
    3,155
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    12:00 PM
    do yourself a favor, toss poyers book in the trash, compare the markings on your scope, that are likely done on a data plate from a Malcom repo scope, to my original mint scope
    warpath metal finishing contact info.
    molinenorski@msn.com
    720-841-1399 during normal bus, hours.

  12. #9
    Legacy Member Salt Flat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 12:32 AM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    761
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:00 AM
    Ghost07, I think you are right about the scope. I did a little research online and it seems to be a legit M73b1 (Type III). The markings are a little different than the earlier M73b1's and do not include the Weaver name. Check these links out:
    https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=51886&page=1
    M73B1 Type I, II, III? | Gunboards Forums
    Last edited by Salt Flat; 10-27-2023 at 01:56 AM.

  13. #10
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-24-2024 @ 03:30 PM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    61
    Posts
    3,155
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    12:00 PM
    the font on the scope isnt indexed like it should be. and not deep enough in one spot as it is in others. look at how straight and nicely indexed the lettering is on this scope
    Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	M73B1 late scope.jpg‎
Views:	86
Size:	38.4 KB
ID:	133583  
    Last edited by Chuckindenver; 10-27-2023 at 08:58 PM.
    warpath metal finishing contact info.
    molinenorski@msn.com
    720-841-1399 during normal bus, hours.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Would like your opinions of this Remington 1903-a4
    By ghost07 in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-20-2024, 09:06 AM
  2. Remington M1903 - Your opinions about
    By Bizio in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-21-2012, 07:14 PM
  3. Opinions on this Remington 1903A3?
    By clarkmilitaria in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-21-2011, 11:18 AM
  4. Remington 1903A3 opinions
    By John Gelotti in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-10-2011, 01:27 PM
  5. Anybody have an opinions on the new remington 1911 R1
    By Thumper in forum 1911/1911A1 Service Pistol
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-27-2010, 12:56 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts