1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member M1lover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 04:36 PM
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    7
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:06 AM
    Thread Starter
    So from a collectors standpoint, it’s less desirable than a .303.

  2. #2
    Contributing Member Sapper740's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2022
    Last On
    Today @ 08:39 AM
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    566
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    10:06 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by M1lover View Post
    So from a collectors standpoint, it’s less desirable than a .303.
    For collectors, somewhat but being converted to a popular cartridge like .308 Winchester might attract a different crowd.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,726
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    08:06 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by M1lover View Post
    So from a collectors standpoint, it’s less desirable than a .303.
    No, I'd say more attractive to advanced collectors or oddly also to those who mostly just want to shoot the rifle, since it is a readily available calibre.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  5. #4
    Legacy Member jamie5070's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    tucson, arizona
    Posts
    548
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    10:06 AM
    Could the "8" in .308 be a misshaped 3? Seams like a lot of work to change from the fatter rimmed .303, to a .308. If it's the original barrel, how will accuracy be in the long run, since the .303 uses a slightly larger bullet?

  6. #5
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 10:21 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,992
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    08:06 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by jamie5070 View Post
    Could the "8" in .308 be a misshaped 3?
    We'd need a different angle of pic to tell.
    Regards, Jim

  7. #6
    Legacy Member oldfoneguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Last On
    Today @ 09:22 AM
    Location
    long island, ny
    Posts
    565
    Real Name
    Bill
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:06 AM
    A close look shows me the 3 and the 8 are different fonts. The 3 has the Victorian era flat top and the 8 is completely round. It looks like the second 3 was overstepped. It doesn't make sense with an original barrel as it would pattern more that group.

    Jamie remember these rifles also came in 30-06 so a later change over wouldn't be too difficult. It would require rebarreling, a magazine change and the rimless extractor. Is it possible that it just mic'ed out to a really tight .308 bore?

  8. #7
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 10:21 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,992
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    05-19-2024
    Local Time
    08:06 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by oldfoneguy View Post
    Is it possible that it just mic'ed out to a really tight .308 bore?
    I had a #4T way back in the '80s that shot .308 bullets just fine. They're out there for sure.
    Regards, Jim

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Remington 1903A3 new purchase questions
    By EddieB in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-18-2024, 09:52 PM
  2. Smith Corona 03A3 Possible Purchase Questions
    By oldfoneguy in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-03-2023, 01:56 AM
  3. Questions about my latest SMLE.
    By Anzac15 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-20-2014, 06:06 AM
  4. Underwood - questions before purchase
    By Burtonaxe in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-22-2012, 07:54 AM
  5. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-17-2011, 07:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts