Search:

Type: Posts; User: Low & Slow; Excluded Forums: Milsurp Knowledge Libraries (READ ONLY)

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Replies
    28
    Views
    1,675

    I just have the one. It slugged out at .320, so I...

    I just have the one. It slugged out at .320, so I use the .32 Special bullets as well, with easy loads.
  2. Replies
    28
    Views
    1,675

    Interesting, thanks. Good to get some accurate...

    Interesting, thanks. Good to get some accurate detailed info on these rifles. Obviously, the myths abound.
  3. Replies
    28
    Views
    1,675

    Ah, so my take is indeed correct then. It's not...

    Ah, so my take is indeed correct then. It's not due to the cartridge at all, just the feeding method.
  4. Replies
    28
    Views
    1,675

    I believe that particular conjecture was due to...

    I believe that particular conjecture was due to the notching of the receiver on the 88/05's. I understand that was because of the change to stripper clip feeding moving the round forward, rather than...
  5. Replies
    28
    Views
    1,675

    Thanks for the rational behind it there.

    Thanks for the rational behind it there.
  6. Replies
    28
    Views
    1,675

    I've got no dog in the fight. Just relaying the...

    I've got no dog in the fight. Just relaying the standard stuff. Would be curious to know for sure why the throats were opened up in some cases though.
  7. Replies
    28
    Views
    1,675

    Usual suspects include lack of controlled feed...

    Usual suspects include lack of controlled feed allowing out of battery detonation when second round (spitzer) hits primer of chambered round, over pressure due to change in bullet diameter, and...
  8. Replies
    28
    Views
    1,675

    Sounds like tenuous sear engagement. Have you...

    Sounds like tenuous sear engagement. Have you tried cocking it and whacking the receiver with a plastic mallet to see if the striker releases without a trigger pull?
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Hi-Lux OPTICS