+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: CLLE 1

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Emb145's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last On
    10-01-2022 @ 06:27 PM
    Location
    Texas Usa
    Posts
    21
    Real Name
    Carl Geist
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:20 PM

    CLLE 1

    How many CLLE1 no star are out their ?
    Where they only converted for the Royal Navy ?
    Are the CLLE upper sling swivels the same as a SMLE?
    Carl
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Contributing Member Gil Boyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last On
    10-09-2024 @ 03:03 AM
    Location
    Home of The Parachute Regiment & 16 Air Assault Brigade
    Posts
    4,772
    Real Name
    Gil Boyd
    Local Date
    11-01-2024
    Local Time
    12:20 AM
    Carl,
    I am sure someone with more knowledge will come on but are you talking about this one forward of the magazine, image from elsewhere some years ago, also this thread from 2017 on the CLLE:
    https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=59906
    Last edited by Gil Boyd; 11-26-2021 at 12:36 PM.
    'Tonight my men and I have been through hell and back again, but the look on your faces when we let you out of the hall - we'd do it all again tomorrow.' Major Chris Keeble's words to Goose Green villagers on 29th May 1982 - 2 PARA

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Emb145's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last On
    10-01-2022 @ 06:27 PM
    Location
    Texas Usa
    Posts
    21
    Real Name
    Carl Geist
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:20 PM
    Thread Starter
    Photos
    Carl

  6. #4
    Contributing Member smle addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 04:17 PM
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    490
    Real Name
    A. G.
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    04:20 PM
    A few possible answers:

    1. Skennertonicon states this type of charger loader is not as common as the Mk I*, with no official date in the list of changes. I have an LSA converted CLLE Mk I (that is pictured in the link provided by Gil Boyd). This is the only one I have ever seen for sale, and I purchased it back in 1992. The few others I have seen (maybe three?) have all been posted here. So a safe guess to answer your question would be very, very few.

    2. While the majority were converted for Naval use, some evidently were not. Mine does not have the "N" stamp, indicating naval ownership.

    3. A quick glance at my CLLE Mk I and an SMLE Mk III*, the sling swivels appear to be the same.

    The only pic I can add that shows the unique feature of this model is the groove cut in the charger bridge to allow for the lower sighting radius of the original MLE Mk I* sights.
    Last edited by smle addict; 11-30-2021 at 04:46 PM.

  7. Thank You to smle addict For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Legacy Member Emb145's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last On
    10-01-2022 @ 06:27 PM
    Location
    Texas Usa
    Posts
    21
    Real Name
    Carl Geist
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:20 PM
    Thread Starter
    I looked in the LES book not much there .
    My CLLE is not navy marked .

    Carl

  9. #6
    Legacy Member Roy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-22-2023 @ 04:09 AM
    Location
    NZ/Ocean
    Posts
    352
    Real Name
    Roy
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    07:20 PM
    I have three CLLE 1's and indeed one of mine is the subject of the thread linked above. All of mine however have been modified/restored so understanding them is quite difficult. One is a India Pattern conversion, though sadly sporterised beyond restoration, is a smart conversion and I will preserve it as such. The third is a range pattern 24" barrel conversion which is matched down to the cocking piece. None that I have seen in NZicon have the conversion factory or date marked on them and most I have seen are N marked. interesting features include hand filed notches for the Mk3 magazine stop clip in the MLE trigger guard with the chain loop removed. I have a hunch they were all imported into NZ for the civilian market pre WW2 since the only two that I know with original features have no NZ ownership marks other than Home Guard markings.
    Keep Calm
    and
    Fix Bayonets

  10. Thank You to Roy For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    Advisory Panel Lance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 04:50 AM
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    681
    Real Name
    Lance
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    07:20 PM
    Greetings Gentlemen

    A quick favor for those having VSM CLLE Mk I's, can you please check the barrel to see what type of rifling you have? My example, marked as CLLE Mk I has its matching 1911 barrel with Medford rifling.

    In 1910 permission was given to use up existing Metford barrels during the CLLE conversion and still mark them as CLLE and not CLLM. From my limited observed rifle bank I have only come across VSM converted rifles like this, but this might be due to the fact that I have only come across VSM CLLE Mk I's?

    Of added interest, mine was later upgraded to Mk VII ammo sighting later in life and it is not Naval marked (sadly).

    Lance

  12. #8
    Contributing Member smle addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 04:17 PM
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    490
    Real Name
    A. G.
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    04:20 PM
    Hello again, Lance.

    I have two VSM converted CLLE MK I*s and both have enfield-rifled barrels. In 2018, I purchased an Enfield converted charger loader. It is marked CLLM I, then had the M struck through with an E re-stamped under it and an asterisk added to the I, making it a CLLE Mk I*. But it still retains it's seven-groove metford barrel.

    Previous thread attached.

    https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=65953

  13. Thank You to smle addict For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Legacy Member husk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 07:03 AM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    172
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    07:20 PM

    CLLE MkI

    My CLLE MkI was converted by LSA in 1910 and still has Metford rifling so it falls in the category that Lance mentions. Serial numbers are matching and it has the groove in the Charger bridge. Royal Winnipeg Rifles. No Naval N.

  15. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to husk For This Useful Post:


  16. #10
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 05:36 AM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,613
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    11:20 PM
    I can claim no credit for this list, I 'found it' some years ago but did not record the source, anyway - hope this helps.


    History Of The Long Lee

    Here are the types and production numbers of long Lee.

    1. Magazine Lee-Metford (MLM) mk. I: 1889-1892. Only a handful left, nearly all upgraded to mk. I*.

    2. Magazine Lee-Metford mk. I*: 1889-1892 (upgrades from mk. I), 1893-c. 1906 (new made), the latter type being scarcer and more desirable (n=359,500 mk. I and mk. I* combined; the records do not differentiate).

    3. Magazine Lee-Metford mk. II: 1892-1896. Moderately scarce (n=252,075).

    4. Magazine Lee-Metford mk. II*: 1895-1896. Rare (n=13,479).

    5. Magazine Lee-Enfield (MLE) mk. I: 1896-1899. Slightly scarce (n=317,196).

    6. Magazine Lee-Enfield mk. I*: 1899-c. 1903. Slightly scarce, though most that exist are in Australiaicon or NZ; uncommon in North America (n=590,841).

    7. Charger-loading Lee-Metford (CLLM) mk. II: 1907-1909. Rare, nearly all upgraded to CLLE mk. I* (n=unknown but no fewer than 4,454).

    8. Charger-loading Lee-Enfield (CLLE) mk. I: 1907?-1914? Rare and exact production dates unknown (n=unknown but no fewer than 778).

    9. Charger-loading Lee-Enfield mk. I*: 1907-c. 1915. Moderately scarce (n=unknown but approx. 327,000 plus most of the CLLMs upgraded).

    The history of the charger-loading series of rifles is confusing and is worth repeating here. In 1902, the List of Changes (LOC) declared that Lee-Metford carbines (§ 11078) and rifles (§ 11498) would, upon rebarrelling with Enfield barrels, be renamed Lee-Enfields. (The List of Changes was a military periodical that detailed the introduction of new weapons, accoutrements and equipment.) For rifles mks. II and II*, the latter marks of arm were to be struck and “L.E.” and “I*” added on the buttsocket. This was logical but made it impossible to verbally distinguish the safetyless former mk. IIs from the safety-fitted former mk. II*s and safety-fitted Lee-Enfields. Two years later, in March 1904, the rule was rescinded. Regardless of barrel type, all (safetyless) rifles that had started as MLM mk. IIs were to be called such (LOC § 12184), and the 1902-vintage “I*” retrostamps were to be crossed out and a new “II” retrostamp added. In July 1907, the conversion programme for the CLLM mk. II and CLLE mk. I* began, the former converted from MLM mk. IIs and the latter from MLE mk. Is and I*s and MLM mk. II*s (LOC §13992). There was no mention of a CLLE mk. I model. In February 1909, the CLLM mk. II conversion program was ended, and all existing CLLMs were to be altered to CLLE mk. I* by having new safety-type bolts fitted (§14758). (In 1910, its being assumed that all Metford barrels would by now have been replaced, the stamping of a distinguishing nocksform “E” for Enfield-rifling was desisted (§ 15000).) In September 1914, the LOC acknowledged its failure previously to mention the CLLE mk. I, going on to describe the alterations necessary to upgrade the model to accept mk. VII ammunition (§ 17041). A month later (§ 17011), the LOC described the same process for the CLLE mk. I*. There was no corresponding entry for the CLLM mk. II because by now all were supposed to have been converted to CLLE mk. I*.

    There were also two Indian charger-loaders described in the Indian List of Changes (ILOC), the CLLE mk. I India Pattern and the CLLE mk. II India Pattern. The former had a charger guide, not bridge, while the latter was virtually identical to the regular Britishicon CLLE mk. I. The India Pattern CLLEs are virtually unknown today. I know of the existence of two of the mk. IIs and none of the mk. Is


    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  17. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. NZ marked CLLE
    By Roy in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-29-2016, 03:08 PM
  2. Ground dug CLLE
    By Brit plumber in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-16-2010, 04:22 PM
  3. CLLE or N9
    By Patrick Chadwick in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-08-2009, 04:56 PM
  4. My other CLLE just came in.
    By Fred G. in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-25-2009, 10:50 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts