-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Interesting reading on vets journal about carbine bayonette
-
08-02-2012 05:05 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I could be wrong but that does not sound unusual. I have read the Carbine bayonet was being used but the Carbines were not equipped with a bayo lug yet. In other words I think the bayo came before the bayo lug. He could of also had a M3 Trench knife.. I am sure someone will know better than I..
-
-
Advisory Panel
There were tales of the carbine bayonet being issued instead of an M3 trench knife.
-
Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:
-
firstflabn
Guest
Per Ruth's second volume, the carbine bayonet was standardized on May 10, 1944. That's cutting it pretty close - more like impossible - for receiving a shipment from the states. During that time period, it took about 60 days from NYPE approving a req from the ETO to the boat being unloaded in a European port. And that doesn't allow any time for making the things.
More than liklely it's a case of poor word choice by the diarist. The trench knife was still being issued in 1945 a full year after it was no longer being made, so no worries about stock.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Is it possible there was a small amount for "trials" in the field, previous to adoption and production?
-
firstflabn
Guest
And the GI in your story just wanders in and gets one, no strings attached? Don't you think if they were issued for trials, there might be some followup by the ordnance folks? 'Trial' doesn't mean the equivalent of putting a note in a bottle to see if someday the finder contacts you. Time for Occam's Razor.
-
-
Legacy Member
Well the carbine was not equipped for a bayonet till about November 1944 as that is when the type 3 barrel bands was first being installed. The first documented appearance of a bayonet on the carbine seems to be in the Philippines or Okinawa in 1945. None seem to have been documented as having been in the European theater till after Germany
surrendered.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Bruce McAskill For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
firstflabn
And the GI in your story just wanders in and gets one, no strings attached? Don't you think if they were issued for trials, there might be some followup by the ordnance folks? 'Trial' doesn't mean the equivalent of putting a note in a bottle to see if someday the finder contacts you. Time for Occam's Razor.
It wasn't my story. I was just throwing the "trials" thing out there. I have no clue. I know that sometimes GI's don't always get all the nomenclature or terms proper. I know this because I worked with two guys that were former US Army that told me the AK was designed to shoot the 5.56 in case of an emergency. Rumors get spread and even GI's fall for them.
As for the OP's story, I have no clue. But sometimes strange things happen in war, and I don't know if it would be the weirdest thing that an item like that might make it into the field for testing without many strings attached. There may have been strings attached in the beginning, but all kinds of things could happen in combat. IMHO. But I could be wrong.
-
Legacy Member
Occam's Razor?
Maybe he just knew someone who was in the arms room? That works.
Trials vary. I've heard that the selector switches on M14s were installed very selectively, only one or two to a platoon etc, etc. Lots of people saying that. Well, in 1967 our entire battalion had them installed, 500 guys, all at once, and we were a Signal Bn. Our trial was cross the river, shoot till you got sick of it and go back across. Nobody asked what we thought of it or cared for that matter.
-
-
Legacy Member
Okanawa Bayonets for sure
Distinguished Rifleman 1966
President's hundred 1965
Marine Corps. Cup 1965
-
The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to karl schmidt For This Useful Post: