-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Duck Ponds
Friends-
I have a question regarding the duck-ponds in M-1917's and P-1914 rifles. I think I read somewhere, where, Eddystone's and Winchester's all had the duck-pond milled into the receiver. I have also read or seem to remember that as for Remington produced rifles that the duck-pond was a "mixed bag." Some had duck-ponds and some didn't?
Is my understanding correct and would someone possibly offer some official commentary regarding this?
Thanks in advance.
Mark
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
06-26-2012 02:18 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Deceased May 2nd, 2020
I cannot speak for the P14's for I know nothing about them. For the M1917's and the "duck ponds" as you call them. My info says:
Remington - None
Winchester - Always
Eddystone - a "crap shoot" some do some don't.
Hope that helps.
-
-
-
Legacy Member
Excuse my ignorance but, Wots a "duck pond"?
-
-
Advisory Panel
hole under the rear sight retaining spring
-
-
Legacy Member
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Remington - None
Winchester - Always
Eddystone - a "crap shoot" some do some don't.
That's it!!! Thank you very much!!!!
-
Legacy Member
Ones without were much valued for conversion to sporters as it avoided the need to fill in or otherwise disguise this unsightly area.
-
-
Advisory Panel
Recently saw a Remington P14 which to my surprise had the "swimming pool" as we tend to call it around here. Previously believed that no Remingtons had this.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-