-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
type 99 with one piece stock
I have a type 99 series 5 with a one piece stock...butt stock on most are two pieces. Does anyone else have a 99 with a one piece stock?
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
01-14-2013 09:39 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
I have seen a couple of Type 38s with one piece stocks - their owner told me that they were spare replacement stocks made during the early part of WW2.
-
-
-
Legacy Member
It would help to see a photo of the one piece stock. These days anybody can have one made on a stock duplicating machine. I have made a few duplicate stocks too.
-
-
Legacy Member
Just to prove my point. Type 38 above and Type 99 long below. I made these back in 1985, not to fool anybody, but the original stocks were sporterized.
Last edited by seabot2; 03-17-2013 at 08:55 PM.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to seabot2 For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
I have type 38. "0" Series #1978156 . Bolt matches gun. Lots of dings and scratches from use. Maker is Kokura.
I would swear that the one piece stock is walnut!
-
Legacy Member
Medic: Do you mean American black walnut? The Japanese
used their indigenous kurumi walnut for some gunstocks although it doesn't look like walnut as we know it. I have also had some T99 stocks that definitely was oak wood ( I must confess to have refinished it).
Last edited by seabot2; 03-24-2013 at 11:06 PM.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
seabot2
Could be Japanese
walnut but I do not have the knowledge to tell the difference. I guess American walnut does not make sense.
My question is,"Why one piece stock?" Early in the war and plenty of wood on hand? Thanks
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
The supposition of WHY the stocks are two pc, is that it is easier to replace the toe of a stock.... as I have been told these are relatively high replacement items and having such a fit makes repair easier. Vs. the traditional story of "to save wood".
Just a thought... when pondering WHY a 1pc stock......
-
Legacy Member
There must be an answer to the two piece stock first to answer the one piece anomaly. The decision for using the two piece stocks for front line guns must have been more than an issue of economy. From a woodworkers point of view, the bottom half of the buttstock has the wood grain angled for maximun strenght. It would also help to see the machinery on which the stocks were made.
By the way, have you guys seen the video on the Enfield discussions here, "Wood Goes To War" ? The making of precision gunstocks in mass quanitities is something to behold. I guess this would be true of all the military guns made by the various countries.
Last edited by seabot2; 03-26-2013 at 01:01 AM.
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
A. F Medic
My question is,"Why one piece stock?" Early in the war and plenty of wood on hand? Thanks
Less wastage. You can make stocks from smaller blanks. Finns use the same method on some Mosin Nagants...
-