Chiappa 9mm M1 Carbine

[imarangemaster]

The local Big 5 has a wood stocked Chiappa 9mm M1 Carbine on sale for $619.00 Not too bad a little weapon, but it has two problems:

One is they have scope mount bases built in, on the front of the receiver, and about 3/4 of the way back. It really messes with the lines of the receiver. Other than having a red dot optic, I can see no use for a scope on a 9mm pistol carbine. The second is the slide. OMG, the right side is not bad, but it is balanced on the left side by a large block of steel, forming a "U" shape around the open top of the action. It is absolutely FUGLY!!!!!! Overall, the weapon has a similar feel to the carbine. It has an adjustable rear sight, has a bayonet lug barrel band, and the stock is a close copy. It just doesn't feel "right," though, and has a funny balance to it.

It apparently uses Beretta 92 magazines. I wish it used Glock magazines, or even S&W Model 59/5900/669/6906 etc. mags. I have tons of both types.

For $600, I could get a nice, clean used Marlin Camp 9 (nice little weapons) and use my S&W mags!

Here is a picture of the left side. Apparently, early versions did not have this monstrosity on the left side, according to early pictures I have seen.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[imarangemaster]

As you can see from the pictures, the stock is at least 1/2" or more wider at the receiver to accommodate the wide slide assembly. Here's a picture of an early release of the 9mm version, WITHOUT THE FUGLY THING! The stock is more like a standard M1 carbine stock.

[Skip]

How many parts are plastic?

[USGI]

How many parts are plastic?

I've got the same question. Does it have about the same in the way of "iron" sights as the .22LR version? - Bob

[imarangemaster]

How many parts are plastic?

I think just the rear sight and trigger/magazine housing were plastic.

The early version without the balancing block was not too bad. The new incarnation with the FUGLY slide gizmo, though, is a no-go for me. It just makes me want a Marlin Camp 9 even more! There is a Wichita PD marked Camp 9 carbine on Gunbroker from back in the time period we looked at them in Washington State. For those agencies that used 59/5900 series, the Camp 9 made sense, especially back in the day when no one carried ARs. I carried an M1 carbine there, even though it was not authorized. I carried an M1 Carbine on the SO in California, though, and even qualified with it every time.

If the Chiappa 9mm M1 carbine was better made, it might be good for an outfit carrying Beretta 92s as duty weapons.

[imntxs554]

Pretty Cool for a 9mm Rifle. Using the WW2 Stock Configuration makes it look Old Fashion and Super Nice rather than these oddly shaped Synthetic Stocks that i've seen in 9mm Rifles. If it uses Beretta Mags you can get those in 30 Rounds and have some fun. ( if there legal to have in your Stste). Here in Texas i would love to shoot that at the Ranch. I can find some use for it..But I opted for the Zastava PAP M85 .223/5.56 to get rid of those Pesky Wild Hogs that seem to tear up everything.

Frank
S F

[browningautorifle]

I'd like one of the Marlin rifles or the Ruger PC4 even better in .40. Very solid if a bit heavy. Take a look at those for hogs Frank...you could use the long mags down there.

[imarangemaster]

When I worked at Bellevue, WA PD, I actually did an evaluation on the Marlin Camp 9 as a possible patrol carbine. We carried model 59s, so mags would have been a snap. I really liked it. It was easy to shoot, accurate, and handled like an M1 Carbine. The thing that killed the idea though, was mostly that they were a bitch to break down and clean. NOT user friendly in that regard. I would love to get one. That is about the only firearm left on my want list now. I had a lead on one for $400, but the seller refused to ship to California.

[browningautorifle]

they were a bitch to break down and clean.

I think the PC4 is too.

[deldriver]

I still have a PC4, but also had a PC9 at one time. I enjoyed both at certain ranges and appreciated the light weight and recoil too. I don't think they were too hard to break down, but I wouldn't call it easy either. The M1 carbine is much easier to take apart.