-
Advisory Panel
Lithgow HT Sniper Pics
As promised here are some pics of my HT rifle as a comparison to the N03(T).
The scope and rifle (53234) are matched but the case is numbered to rifle 32174 so if anyone knows who the owner of rifle 32174 is I'd be happy to swap cases if he has mine.
Cheers,
Simon.
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
04-02-2016 12:05 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Wrong flag for the occasion Simon !
-
-
Advisory Panel
At the time the rifle was converted yes but not when it was first manufactured.

Originally Posted by
mike1967
Wrong flag for the occasion Simon !
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
Simon
At the time the rifle was converted yes but not when it was first manufactured.

No, 1901 was when we got the Southern Cross
-
Advisory Panel
Bugger!!

Originally Posted by
mike1967
No, 1901 was when we got the Southern Cross

-
Legacy Member
Is the butt stamp R over MA over the date the norm? I've always thought the R meant refurbed.
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
Homer
Is the butt stamp R over MA over the date the norm? I've always thought the R meant refurbed.
A quick look at the survey pics, of a bit over 20 different rifles with clear pics of the butt markings, the "R/MA/date to store" outnumbers "MA/date to store" about 4 to 1. In the survey questions, of the just over 40 out of 210 that answered in a way that allowed me to determine if R/MA or just MA was used, the split is also about the same, 4 to 1.
I take the R to mean refurbished/ rebuilt/ repaired as well... I suppose it depended on the bloke doing the markings as to what he put on them, there was obviously no hard and fast rule... none that was obeyed anyway.
-
The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Son For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
-
-
Contributing Member
I've noticed that the R is a larger size than the original MA and varies in position, indicating that it was stamped after the original MA/date, probably when upgraded to HT.
But as the rifles themselves are of varying dates and mostly with replacement butts, it is difficult to work out, most HT's being converted from H rifles.
How many if any retain their original or 1930's butts?
Attachment 71556Attachment 71557
-
-
Advisory Panel
From what I have on file, the date stamp on the butts are the date the rifle was sent to store after conversion to HT.
I hadn't paid any attention to the size of the letters before, and am away from my files ATM, but here is one pic with the same prportions in the stamps to consider...Attachment 71560
-
Thank You to Son For This Useful Post: