It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !
Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.
I own a Ross Mk2 that was purchased by the US. When the rear sight is raised, the sight can be adjusted for windage and elevation, and the peep sight is used. My question is, what is the notch for that is directly above the opening used for the peep sight. The peep sight in the photo is set for 300 yards. Is the notch above the peep now set for 700 yards as indicated by the < on the sight?
I believe that the fixed notch at the top of the sight is for max elevation.
Thanks for looking at this.
Information
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
The notch visible when the sight is folded down is the "battle sight"; not sure what range it is calibrated for, but it's the trajectory of Mk.VI ball, not Mk.VII.
The circled notch would I think be read from the line indicated from the left hand arrow, and the aperture would be read from the mark indicated by the right hand arrow.
Looks like someone has been prying under the lower end of the leaf and I'd guess that was done when the elevation screw was turned too far down and some pressure needed to be applied to get the leaf to pick up the thread again.
The ".22" stamped at the top suggests the sight was mounted on a .22 training rifle at some point?
Last edited by Surpmil; 02-14-2024 at 02:01 PM.
Reason: Typos
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Information
PM
