-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Hand stamped M only receivers 1 or 2 handstamped
When did the hand stamped M only with the 1 or 2 added as needed. I have an Inland # 6,380,xxx . From what I can find the M2s started after the 6.6 million number. Whhy would they make a M only receiver before the M2s were in production ?
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
08-05-2023 04:46 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Here's a link to an older thread that you may not have seen yet. Also wanted to make sure you understand that only the 1 or 2 were "hand stamped" on these, not the "M". The pictures are missing from the thread in the link, but you should be able to find some in your searches. On mine the "1" is a bit lower than the "M" and was done after it was parkerized.
https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=64468&page=1
Let us know what your barrel date is and also post a picture of the stamping on the receiver. My older brother has a 6,418,xxx Inland from the CMP
that has an 11-44 barrel and is not hand stamped. - Bob
This is a pic of my 6.9M receiver stamping:
-
-
-
Contributing Member
Turns out that the OP's Inland is not a hand stamp, just a heavy roll stamp on the right side of the receiver ring making the "1" look a bit different, it is discussed in this CCC forum thread.
hand stamp questin - The Carbine Collector's Club - Page 1
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to W5USMC For This Useful Post:
-
Charlie-Painter777
A Country Has No Greater Responsibility Than To Care For Those Who Served...
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to painter777 For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
If you look, the E in carbine is also distorted.
When they tell you to behave, they always forget to specify whether to behave well or badly!

-