-
Legacy Member
No32scope marks ?
I've seen some N32 have written some markings in blue and red on the sides.What does that mean?
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
04-08-2012 11:37 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
The red W = waterproofing and the blue B = anti bloom ... 
Regards,
Doug
-
Thank You to Badger For This Useful Post:
-
-
Advisory Panel

Originally Posted by
Badger
The red W = waterproofing and the blue B = anti bloom ...
Regards,
Doug
I always thought "blooming" referred to lens coatings to enhance light transmission.
For some reason I call those "flowers" that appear when the balsam begins to give way in cemented lenses "floration", but I suppose the term could be used for fungal growth on lenses as well.
Last edited by Surpmil; 04-28-2012 at 07:59 PM.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
-
Surpmil is right. The B is a hard 'blue-ish' coating to enhance the light transmission and is said to eliminate (but it doesn't.....?) light scatter. The trouble is that after the average civilian shooter has set about cleaning his lenses - going round and round in ever decreasing circles until he hits the middle - with length of old grime encrusted shirt tail from the bottom of his shooting box, it just removes the coating. If telescopes had been roughly cleaned by the snipers and the coating was partially removed, then we'd remove it all with a slightly abrasive rouge on the basis that the effect was still working (?) along the inner optical system of the telescope. The OG end was the most important because if the coating on the outer convex side of that lens was polished away, when the scope was focussed against the light screen, you'd get a slight 'starry' effect but I digress
The red W is a two edged sign. It indicates on a Mk2W, a Mk2/1 and a 3 that a) the telescope is fitted with waterproof drums* and b) that the telescope is in fact waterproof according to the tests in the depression cupboard. However, that REALLY indicates shower proof - as in the rain in temperate climes and NOT a monsoon in Malaya or as deck cargo on a submarine!
* The W drums are those with a rubber/neoprene/fibre 'O' ring at the base of the thumbscrew, between the index plate and the clicker plate. The Mk2.
I hope that has clarified the point
-
Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
is said to eliminate (but it doesn't.....?) light scatter.
Which would correspond to Badger's "anti-bloom" terminology, no? I always figured "Blooming" was a shortening of "anti-blooming coating" where "bloom" is equivalent to "flare", "glare", or "ding-dang bright spots that hinder seeing squat downrange!"
-
-
Advisory Panel
Interesting point jmoore. A search online shows almost no mention of "anti-bloomed lens/es", quite a few mentions of "anti-bloom" and many mentions of "bloomed lenses". The question is I suppose is it a coating to improve light transmission or a coating to inhibit "bloom", which is light diffusion as you mentioned. Perhaps there is some ambiguity there in the terminology as it has developed over time. We'd have to know what the purpose of the coating was in each case to know which term was correct I suppose.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-