-
Contributing Member
IBM 3.7 with round bolt
IBM with X marked on top round bolt.
While reading the current issue of the Carbine Club newsletter I got this out for comparison. It seemed like a good time to take some pictures and ask for options and comments regarding proper parts for this serial number and originality over all.
I don’t think there are any reproduction parts or that the front or rear sights have ever been removed, but someone else may see it differently. The IN B of the right side of the rear sight was double struck; looks to me that the stamp was badly worn.
Thanks in advance.
John
Attachment 33127Attachment 33128
Attachment 33129Attachment 33130Attachment 33131Attachment 33132Attachment 33133Attachment 33134Attachment 33135Attachment 33136Attachment 33137Attachment 33138Attachment 33139Attachment 33140Attachment 33141Attachment 33142Attachment 33143Attachment 33144Attachment 33145Attachment 33146Attachment 33147Attachment 33148
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Hercules Powder For This Useful Post:
-
04-23-2012 08:51 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Hey John,
That's a very nice IBM. At first glance I would have said your L379 slide is too late, but it may very well be one that was laterally transferred from Inland during this time. Thanks for sharing and here's another X Bolt IBM carbine. This example is a birch low wood, AOB slide, type 1 band, F OB rear sight, and IBM barrel, no date.

Last edited by dbarn; 04-23-2012 at 10:14 PM.
-
-
I've got a 3.8 mil IBM with IBM barrel. The barrel has no date and no ordnance bomb. I think it might have been made around 12-43, or 1-44. In WarBaby, some of the IBM carbines going through trials 12-43 had s/n's really close to mine. What kind of camera are you using? - those are great pictures. - Bob
-
Thank You to USGI For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
Bob, If are are asking me the camera is a Sony Cyber-shot 8.1 mega pixels. John
-
Thank You to Hercules Powder For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Bob,
Mine was also produced around the same time frame. Those photos are several years old and were taken using the macro setting. Still have the same camera, a Canon A310.
-
I should have been more specific about which pictures, but both sets are great! My old digital camera is a Sony MVC-FD95 (floppy disk) and my newer one is a Canon A-560 which ran about 1/5 the cost. They both have their strong points. I use the Canon more because it's small and simpler. Thanks - Bob
-