-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
4198 Powder W/175 Gr Jacketed
I know this is too fast a powder for anything normal velocity in 30-06, but with the powder shortage and a chance to get some for a low load use, does anyone have any experience with it?
I know its ok for lead pills but I don't shoot lead, just 175 gr target bullets.
Its only 100 yard maximum so no need for velocity and often just at 50 yards.
I would want it as accurate as 4831 but not the least concerned how fast it goes as long as its accurate.
I don't want to use fillers as its just a bridge powder so question is would it ignite ok as I know it would be a pretty low case volume.
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
Last edited by RC20; 08-29-2013 at 06:49 PM.
-
08-29-2013 06:41 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
It's simple, if the powder manufacturer doesn't have a recommendation for it, don't do it. Get the book or study the info produced by the people that know. Second hand or memorized info isn't worth your eyesight or possible injury. Cartridge Loads - Hodgdon Reloading Data Center - data.hodgdon.com
This site has all the info. Just follow through...you haven't said whether you're talking 4198 IMR or H...that's the first thing. They don't list it at all. That should tell you enough. Watch and shoot...
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
With all due respect, I would appreciate it if the response either addresses the question or stay silent, in which case there is no response needed.
Thank you
-
Advisory Panel
I did address the question. Read the data provided for your answer.
-
-
Advisory Panel
IMR's old data booklets listed a wide range of powders, but were a bit stingy with bullet weights. Here's some of the data for .30/06 with 150 and 200 grain bullets - note that they are "maximum" loads and pressures are copper crusher style. For a 175 grain bullet, split the difference - expecting 37 grains to give about 2440 fps at "max" pressure.
.30-06
REM. CASE; REM. 9 1/2 PR
REM. 150 GR. PTD. SPCL
.308" DIA.; 23" BBL.; 3.200" C.O.L.
Powder Charge Vel. C.U.P
IMR 4198 38.0 2600 50000
.30-06
REM. CASE; REM. 9 1/2 PR
SIERRA 200 GR. MATCH KING HP
.308" DIA.; 23" BBL.; 3.340" C.O.L.
IMR 4198 36.0 2285 48400
QuickLOAD gives the following estimates with 4198 -
Cartridge : .30-06 Spring.
Bullet : .308, 175, Sierra HPBT MatchK 2275
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.340 inch or 84.84 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch or 609.6 mm
Powder : IMR 4198
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
-20.0 59 29.60 2074 1671 26979 5427 100.0 1.627
-18.0 60 30.34 2111 1732 28340 5521 100.0 1.596
-16.0 61 31.08 2148 1792 29754 5614 100.0 1.566
-14.0 63 31.82 2184 1853 31222 5707 100.0 1.537
-12.0 64 32.56 2219 1914 32747 5798 100.0 1.509
-10.0 66 33.30 2254 1975 34330 5889 100.0 1.482
-08.0 67 34.04 2289 2036 35972 5979 100.0 1.456
-06.0 69 34.78 2323 2097 37674 6068 100.0 1.426
-04.0 70 35.52 2357 2158 39440 6157 100.0 1.397
-02.0 72 36.26 2390 2220 41269 6244 100.0 1.369
+00.0 73 37.00 2423 2281 43166 6331 100.0 1.341
+02.0 75 37.74 2456 2343 45130 6417 100.0 1.315
+04.0 76 38.48 2488 2405 47165 6502 100.0 1.290
+06.0 78 39.22 2520 2467 49274 6586 100.0 1.265
+08.0 79 39.96 2551 2530 51457 6669 100.0 1.242 ! Near Maximum !
+10.0 81 40.70 2583 2592 53719 6752 100.0 1.219 ! Near Maximum !
Not the optimum powder for the '06 case, but certainly no reason it won't work OK in moderate doses.
Last edited by Parashooter; 08-29-2013 at 11:04 PM.
-
-
Advisory Panel
OK, that's IMR, but does he have that or H 4198...? He hasn't clarified.
-
-
Advisory Panel
Cartridge : .30-06 Spring.
Bullet : .308, 175, Sierra HPBT MatchK 2275
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.340 inch or 84.84 mm
Barrel Length : 24.0 inch or 609.6 mm
Powder : Hodgdon H4198
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
-20.0 56 29.60 2020 1585 25782 5452 97.6 1.664
-18.0 57 30.34 2059 1648 27082 5583 98.1 1.631
-16.0 59 31.08 2098 1710 28432 5708 98.6 1.599
-14.0 60 31.82 2136 1773 29833 5828 99.0 1.568
-12.0 62 32.56 2174 1837 31288 5943 99.3 1.539
-10.0 63 33.30 2212 1901 32798 6053 99.5 1.510
-08.0 64 34.04 2249 1965 34365 6157 99.7 1.482
-06.0 66 34.78 2285 2029 35990 6255 99.9 1.455
-04.0 67 35.52 2321 2094 37675 6347 100.0 1.426
-02.0 69 36.26 2357 2159 39423 6432 100.0 1.396
+00.0 70 37.00 2392 2224 41234 6514 100.0 1.368
+02.0 71 37.74 2427 2289 43112 6595 100.0 1.339
+04.0 73 38.48 2461 2354 45059 6676 100.0 1.313
+06.0 74 39.22 2495 2419 47077 6755 100.0 1.287
+08.0 75 39.96 2529 2485 49168 6834 100.0 1.262
+10.0 77 40.70 2562 2550 51336 6912 100.0 1.238 ! Near Maximum !
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Thank you, that is what I was looking for, much appreciated
Last edited by RC20; 08-30-2013 at 01:32 PM.
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
And while the burn rates are so close as to be realistically irrelevant, it is IMR
-
Advisory Panel
Good luck with this one...
-