-
Legacy Member
Enfield Importer Question
Is there any practical way for a member of the public here in the United States
to find out when a particular fire arm was imported into this country? I have recently learned that the “CAI ST ALB VT” stamp on the barrel of my Enfield, which I originally took to be an armorer’s code specific to that barrel, is actually Century Arms International Saint Albans, Vermont (sad I know but I’m learning). Some opinions seem to be that while the BATF requires the importer’s information be stamped on the gun, they do not track it, or at least not in any way I would have access to. I thought about contacting Century Arms but as they have been importing weapons since the early 1960s and have changed physically, moved, and morphed into the corporation they are today I imagine they would be less than interested in looking something up for me just because I asked nicely. So is there a way? With the Moisn’s you can narrow it down a bit to before or after the ATF began requiring the importer included a serial number (Cyrillic alphabet and duplicate numbers was the cause I’m told) but I do not believe that to be the case with Enfields.
As a secondary question I know the Mosin Nagant history where the Russians tore everything down after the second world war, had a massive refurbishing champagne, then stored the weapons away for WWIII which never materialized as such so they pulled ‘em out and sold ‘em. How did it go with British
military arms? Was there a similar rebuild campaign and subsequent storage? My Enfield does not have FTR (I think that’s the term) stamped on it but I’m sure if it was in any kind of prolonged use it was rebuilt/repaired perhaps several times before Century got it and imported it to the United States. How did that system work, military, to importer, to hungry public?
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
02-21-2015 08:32 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Banjo,
I don't have the full answer to your question -- maybe someone does. However, I think you are going to find that unless the U.S. Government has a record of all the transactions, this is going to be a MONSTEROUS question. The reason is that so many importers existed, and many are out of business, especially after the Gun Control Act was passed in 1968.
One of the really big importers was IAC. If you check out this link, Dropbox - IAC Arsenal from Gun Magazine pp 29-32 43-44.pdf you will see the magnitude of the what was imported in the 1950s (when you could buy an Enfield for $12-15)
Good luck, Robert
-
-
Banjo, you have asked so many questions and raised so many points that it'd be impossible to get the whole lot answered........... And when some ARE answered, there'll be more Q's forthcoming, believe me! Why don't jou just ask a couple of pertinent Q's at a time. Take for example, last para, last 3 lines. Must be about 6 Q's there that relate just to UK
Military stuff that I could answer. But I ain't got all day to go through the post-war UK Ordnance system when most of the answers have already been answered here before.
Sorry to sound a but blunt but suggest you take a few days and read through the archives.
Reminds me of a letter I got while at the Small Arms School. It went something like '........will you please be so kind as to send me details of everything that you have on bullpup rifles.....'. Have you ever tried telling someone in a diplomatic sort of way that they need to get out a bit more?
-
Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
Contributing Member
Its because of you......I now live in a shoebox on a motorway, sun, rain, stars the works.
'Tonight my men and I have been through hell and back again, but the look on your faces when we let you out of the hall - we'd do it all again tomorrow.' Major Chris Keeble's words to Goose Green villagers on 29th May 1982 - 2 PARA
-
-
Legacy Member
First off, I find no one here blunt or rude. I appreciate the comments. Second, I'm learning about Lee-Enfields and the group and am very appreciative of the response and the welcome I have received. If I'm being unrealistic I'd rather be told that up front rather than placated or ignored. So all comments so far make perfect sense and I will attempt to focus and spare the group my "sixty questions". Thanks all
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Banjo1928 For This Useful Post:
-
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Thanks for the info Brian, obviously "I know not what I ask" it never really occurred to me the staggering size of the numbers. It's amazing.
-
-
-
Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post: