1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member gravityfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:35 PM
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    74
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    07:49 AM

    Question on Sten identification for Mr. Laidler.

    Hi, Mr. Laidlericon,

    This may interest you (I hope so). I have a Sten, and despite a thorough reading of your most interesting book, I cannot identify it. Could you possibly help to do so?

    It was said to be from an estate sale, so no known history, but also said to be unfired since the semi-auto conversion. How they can know that and not know the history is beyond me. However, the barrel is in an excellent condition, so it may well be hardly-used.

    The best description I can give is that it very closely resembles a Mk.III, but it is drawn tube; not pressed, rolled and welded. There is no top (or other) seam. Other than the butt, cap, housing, spring and breech block, the rest is all one piece. The mag well is welded on - not spot welded, so there is no plunger. It does have a finger guard. The finger guard is affixed using three of the barrel rivets. Oh, the other piece that can come off is the mechanism cover; this is the unbolted pop-on type. It has a Mk.V cocking handle, but does not lock in the forward position because although the breech block is drilled through, there is no matching hole in the casing. Neither end of the spring has a collar.

    There does not appear to be any phosphate or oil-blackened finish, just thick black paint.

    The breech block is a Mk.I* or II. The butt is exactly like the No.3 Mk.0, but the crossbar is not used for the sling, as there is an added squarish sling loop on the lower arm about a third of the way from the heel of the butt, and a sling is permanently attached to it; just folded around the loop and stitched. The other end of the sling has the free-swivelling hook obviously made from a nail. The front sling loop is underneath the main tube, so the whole thing naturally hangs completely upside down.

    The only external identification I can find is on the top of the mag well: STEN.M.C. over SA over much smaller and in a tiny rectangular cartouche; SA again.. On the underside of the mag well is a partly obliterated serial number; The "8" digits are clear, the rest are poorly struck. Best I can guess is G08387 - if a G then definitely sans serif. Internally, there are some marks on the breech block. Crown over undeciferable letter, Broad Arrow, oval cartouche with BECo (Baird, Boulier, Broadway?) No other component has any form of identification that I can find.

    The standard of the build is excruciatingly bad. The welds are all pidgeon crap, some finished off with an angle grinder from the look of them. Weld spatters abound. Possibly the ugliest weld job is that which attaches the mag well. It looks more like an avalanche.

    I don't have any photos at the moment. My camera is totally crap, yet still better at photography than am I.

    Now naturally, I'm hoping you will tell me that I have a long-lost, only remaining specimen, invaluable prototype something or other. However, I suspect that you will instead inform me that I have some piece of crap made up from mixed parts kits and assembled in someone's garage, or the Khyber Pass. Fingers crossed.

    Anyway, I tried it out today, and it functions just fine. I was very pleased with its performance all around. Definitely FUN!

    I hope all that piques your interest somewhat, and will allow you to form an pinion of my new friend.

    Cheers,
    Conrad
    (gravityfan)
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 06:47 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,672
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    03:49 PM
    It sounds like a Morris Minor. But if you put a picture on site, I'll be a bit more specific

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. A question for Mr. Laidler
    By jas57 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-29-2009, 04:13 AM
  2. gun identification
    By mb53 in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-26-2009, 01:20 AM
  3. help in identification...
    By Buzzkill in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-15-2008, 12:39 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts