+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Thread: Is this M1D Authentic?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member bearhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-16-2024 @ 02:46 PM
    Location
    Okanogan, BC
    Posts
    509
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    02:28 PM

    Question Is this M1D Authentic?

    I would like some opinions on its authenticity.

    The only M1D rifles I've seen with serial numbers of the scope and receiver stamped on the stock were from Taiwan.

    Another fellow mentioned that the Hong Kong Police did the same thing.

    I've never seen it on a Dane M1D or the other US M1D I owned previously.

    The rifle was originally built in 1943 and has the had the molten lead dip treatment.

    All parts, including the barrel are SA, which is S-A 53. The only parts not SA are the trigger group. The bore is pristine.

    I have no provenance or story to go with the rifle.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Contributing Member Mark in Rochester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 12:40 PM
    Location
    Rochester, New York
    Posts
    7,165
    Real Name
    Mark in Rochester
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    05:28 PM
    Have never seen a staking on the attachment knob like that

    Hinge pin on the mount - the ends should be rounded - can not tell

    If the T37 has a casting ridge around the clearance for the cylinder lock screw then it is a fake T-37

    a D barrel will have a 555 in the drawing number

    the 6-53 on the pad looks odd - like it was hand drawn

    Are there any marks on the receiver leg?

    Many will not value a undocumented M1D
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose
    There are no great men, only great challenges that ordinary men are forced by circumstances to meet.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Legacy Member Calif-Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-26-2025 @ 07:23 PM
    Posts
    2,517
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    04:28 PM
    Just has the look of a modern re-creation. My M1D came out of Canadaicon 20 years ago. It looks nothing like the one in question.

  5. #4
    Legacy Member bearhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-16-2024 @ 02:46 PM
    Location
    Okanogan, BC
    Posts
    509
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    02:28 PM
    Thread Starter
    This M1D is in Canadaicon. M1Ds are very scarce in Canada
    .
    The stamps on the cheek pad are definitely stamped, not drawn.

    No casting ridge around the clearance for the lock screw

    There is no 555 in the drawing number. I'm a little surprised at this one, I was under the impression that M1Ds were assembled from regular run of the mill rifles that had proven to be extraordinarily accurate, much like the Britishicon No4 T.

    I will take a few more pics and see if I can impose on Badger to post more.

  6. #5
    Legacy Member bearhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-16-2024 @ 02:46 PM
    Location
    Okanogan, BC
    Posts
    509
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    02:28 PM
    Thread Starter
    More pics .....

  7. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    mollydodger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-19-2014 @ 12:01 PM
    Location
    St Louis Mizzery
    Posts
    4
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    05:28 PM

    M1d

    The barrel drawing number ending in 555 should be UNDER the rear handguard on top of the barrel. It appears your scope mount does have rounded ends on the hinge pin so I would say it is genuine USGI. Without paperwork to substantiate the rifle you will always be told it is worth the value of the parts. It could be a genuine USGI M1D but without definitive paperwork to prove it you have what must be assumed to be a parts rifle.

  8. #7
    Legacy Member GUTS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    04-11-2025 @ 09:19 PM
    Location
    South Dakota
    Age
    67
    Posts
    575
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    04:28 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by mollydodger View Post
    The barrel drawing number ending in 555 should be UNDER the rear handguard on top of the barrel. It appears your scope mount does have rounded ends on the hinge pin so I would say it is genuine USGI. Without paperwork to substantiate the rifle you will always be told it is worth the value of the parts. It could be a genuine USGI M1D but without definitive paperwork to prove it you have what must be assumed to be a parts rifle.
    The earlier M1C and some very early M1D's(SA) had the drawing number on the top of the barrel under the handguard, Most of the M1D's had the number on the side of the barrel, you could see it when you locked the bolt back. The correct number is: D7312555 MD 34 SA month year. This is the barrel on my M1D.



    And the stock. A correct stock is normally marked like this.

    Cheeck pad holes.



    I also feel that there is a few different types of M1D. Original, Authentic, and just plain fake.
    Last edited by GUTS; 02-15-2010 at 12:40 AM.

  9. Thank You to GUTS For This Useful Post:


  10. #8
    Advisory Panel
    JGaynor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    03-25-2025 @ 07:37 PM
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    888
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    05:28 PM
    My M1D's Barrel is marked as follows:
    Barrel – Under rear hand guard app. 3.5 inches in front of receiver ring (12 o’clock)
    Drawing Number D7312555 A178B

    Symbol - Ordnance Escutcheon (crossed cannons encircled by belt) M M


    Barrel Date: at 3 o’clock viewed from chamber (viewable with bolt retracted)

    S-A – 10-52

    Letter “P” lying on its side

    My understanding is that the M1D Barrel Assembly (D7312555 bbl w/ scope base) was marked in the majority of cases at 12 O'clock under the rear handguard.

    Regards,

    Jim

  11. Thank You to JGaynor For This Useful Post:


  12. #9
    Legacy Member GUTS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    04-11-2025 @ 09:19 PM
    Location
    South Dakota
    Age
    67
    Posts
    575
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    04:28 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by JGaynor View Post
    My M1D's Barrel is marked as follows:
    Barrel – Under rear hand guard app. 3.5 inches in front of receiver ring (12 o’clock)
    Drawing Number D7312555 A178B

    Symbol - Ordnance Escutcheon (crossed cannons encircled by belt) M M


    Barrel Date: at 3 o’clock viewed from chamber (viewable with bolt retracted)

    S-A – 10-52

    Letter “P” lying on its side

    My understanding is that the M1D Barrel Assembly (D7312555 bbl w/ scope base) was marked in the majority of cases at 12 O'clock under the rear handguard.

    Regards,

    Jim
    Thanks Jim, I appologize for presenting information that wasn't 100% correct. I thought most of the M1D's were marked on the side.
    Here is a picture from Mr. Canfields book of a late Fall, early Winter dated barrel marked at 3:00 like mine.

  13. #10
    Legacy Member bearhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-16-2024 @ 02:46 PM
    Location
    Okanogan, BC
    Posts
    509
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    02:28 PM
    Thread Starter
    I can understand where your coming from mollydodger but in Canadaicon we don't have the benefit of CMPicon. I'm very surprised that there isn't a lot more interest or knowledge about M1D rifles than seems to be available on the web.
    To rely on CMP provenance is OK but it certainly leaves a lot to be desired. The US either loaned, leased or sold M1D rifles all over the world, including Canada, Denmarkicon, Englandicon, Hong Kong, Korea, Viet Nam, Thailand, Taiwan, Norwayicon, etc. Some of these nations, like Canada, just kept them in storage and other than to play with a few of them, never used them. Most went to Denmark in the mid fifties in a large sale. To nullify their existence by only accepting CMP provenance is like cutting off you nose to spite your face.

    I guess you have a lot of rifles made up from parts in the US and it makes sense that it happens, given the availability of parts and the "mystique" of owning a sniper. It's to bad that the practise is so wide spread as to have an entire country rejecting the other rifles, just because they don't have CMP provenance. In other countries, the parts availability to make up these fakes is almost, if not nil.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Authentic scant stock?
    By Jager1855 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-22-2010, 12:56 PM
  2. Authentic? My No.5 carbine gets naked....
    By rondog in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-07-2010, 04:08 PM
  3. Is mine authentic?
    By RobD in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 02-03-2010, 05:15 PM
  4. Is this SG M1 Carbine Stock Authentic?
    By rcmauser in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-08-2009, 05:46 PM
  5. Is this SG M1 Carbine Stock Authentic?
    By rcmauser in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-07-2009, 02:45 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts