+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Lee Enfield No1 Mkiii Lithgow 1942

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    84mmcarl-gustav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last On
    06-24-2022 @ 08:30 PM
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    55
    Local Date
    05-27-2024
    Local Time
    07:13 AM

    Lee Enfield No1 Mkiii Lithgow 1942

    Hi,i am restoring a lee enfield no1 mkIII lighgow ma 1942,i would like to know if somebody can tel me about those marking on the rifle butt,thanks,see picture

    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Amatikulu; 03-02-2010 at 08:54 PM. Reason: fixed picture

  2. #2
    Legacy Member Rowdy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    04-25-2024 @ 03:09 AM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    88
    Local Date
    05-27-2024
    Local Time
    06:13 AM
    Well the butt in your picture is from an early Lithgowicon - about 1915-23 and looks like varnished Queensland maple.
    It could have been reused in a later FTR though not common practice.

  3. Thank You to Rowdy For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Bindi2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 07:10 AM
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,447
    Local Date
    05-27-2024
    Local Time
    07:13 PM
    Is the 42 date on the socket (year of manufacture) or the butt (year of FTR)

  6. Thank You to Bindi2 For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    RJW NZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    10-04-2014 @ 11:58 PM
    Location
    Auckland NZ
    Posts
    1,241
    Local Date
    05-27-2024
    Local Time
    04:13 AM
    HV = high velocity ammo, it means/confirms the rear sight was recalibrated after an ammo change over/improvement that happened around 1905.
    The shield is the Lithgowicon factory logo.
    The roman 3 under what looks like a year date of 192-? ish, might have also had a star on the upper right corner of the 111, which was the official designation to denote that the magazine cut off was not used/deleted on this model. Its dodgy on wood as wood moves from gun to gun whereas a metal stamp does not.
    The correct year of making is stamped on the wrist.

  8. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    84mmcarl-gustav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last On
    06-24-2022 @ 08:30 PM
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    55
    Local Date
    05-27-2024
    Local Time
    07:13 AM
    Thread Starter
    hi,very interesting,is this mean this rifle as been made 1915 and reused 1942,thank for all your info

    Last edited by Amatikulu; 03-02-2010 at 08:55 PM. Reason: fixed picture

  9. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    RJW NZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    10-04-2014 @ 11:58 PM
    Location
    Auckland NZ
    Posts
    1,241
    Local Date
    05-27-2024
    Local Time
    04:13 AM
    Other way around; made in 1942 and had pre made wood installed.

    When/as the japanese emergency developed enfield production was accelerated. One way to speed up production was to use stocks of previously made wood sets from years gone by, so its quite common for Australianicon ww2 enfields to have wood sets from years other than the wrist stamp.
    They also re conditioned older enfields, like my 1918 with 1942 wood, and put them back into service, usually not as front line rifles though, more home defence, which btw, had the potential to become front line equipment quite suddenly if the japanese invaded.

  10. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    bradtx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last On
    11-29-2010 @ 08:01 AM
    Location
    Pearland, TX
    Posts
    302
    Local Date
    05-27-2024
    Local Time
    05:13 AM
    hightlander138, I can't say positively, but I'm guessing that the butt was replaced after it was sold out of service. The reason being that it has no 'to stores' date stamped, which would be common at the time. Also missing is the 'return to stores' date, but that is missing on some butts anyway.

    Brad

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Lithgow No1 MkIII* HT Sniper Rifle Survey
    By Son in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 03-29-2022, 07:32 PM
  2. Lithgow MkIII Annual Production 1913-1918?
    By Cold_Zero in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-21-2010, 10:51 PM
  3. My Lithgow No1 MkIII*
    By MontaukTrl in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-20-2009, 09:18 PM
  4. Lithgow Sniper Rifle No1 MkIII* HT (AUST)/1
    By Son in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 06:18 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts