1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel breakeyp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:08 PM
    Location
    near Detroit Michigan
    Age
    78
    Posts
    971
    Real Name
    Paul Breakey
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    05:55 AM

    Fazakerley final No.5 production comments

    I have been looking at my Fazakerley production No.5s, making first drafts for an article and find this interesting:

    Per Skennertonicon's SAAI No.5 booklet, Fazakerley was told to stop No.5 production on September 25, 1947. In other books he has commented on my rifles having receiver dates of October and December 1947. I have been looking for a 1948 for the last 20 years with no success.

    For what it is worth, 10/47 is serial no. AC4718
    12/47 is serial no. AC6299

    1581 or there about may have been produced in the last two months.

    For those who like to fiddle with numbers.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to breakeyp For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    rondog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    05-09-2016 @ 02:13 PM
    Location
    Parker, CO
    Posts
    258
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    05:55 AM
    Just for giggles, here's mine....


  4. #3
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    05-20-2025 @ 04:45 PM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,119
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    05:55 AM
    I have 12/47 sn. AC 6391

  5. Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Legacy Member Simon P's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    06-10-2025 @ 06:24 AM
    Location
    Essex. UK.
    Posts
    645
    Real Name
    Simon Pemberton
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    10:55 AM
    Out of interest are the barrels also engraved with the same serial number, my 1945 dated Fazakerley has the serial number engraved on the right side of the barrel between the lightning cuts.

  7. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    rondog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    05-09-2016 @ 02:13 PM
    Location
    Parker, CO
    Posts
    258
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    05:55 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Simon P View Post
    Out of interest are the barrels also engraved with the same serial number, my 1945 dated Fazakerley has the serial number engraved on the right side of the barrel between the lightning cuts.
    My barrel is, and the bolt, and the stock. Maybe something else too, not sure.

  8. #6
    Legacy Member Strangely Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 04:55 AM
    Location
    Wiltshire UK
    Age
    73
    Posts
    579
    Real Name
    Mick Kelly
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    10:55 AM
    1/47 Z172 (Mine)
    I never did fully understand how the numbering system worked; so I assume that when the Z's were finished they started AA, AB, AC?
    Mick

  9. #7
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 04:48 PM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,671
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    10:55 AM
    I think strangely Brown is right because I had a No5 serial BJ ----. I never bothered to loook at the date.

  10. #8
    Advisory Panel breakeyp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:08 PM
    Location
    near Detroit Michigan
    Age
    78
    Posts
    971
    Real Name
    Paul Breakey
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    05:55 AM
    Thread Starter
    Now to stir the pot and add a few spices:

    Skenny says No.5 FE serial number production occurred 2/44 and 3/44.

    FE 70 built and marked 2/44

    FE 298 built 2/44

    FE 964 built 3/44

    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX FE721 built and marked 1/44 XXXXXXXXXXXX

    This is why I laugh at the characters who says their gun serial number was 1st day production, 1st week, 1st month etc. All serial numbers mean is that they are a way of finding problems and getting paid.


    Oh! yes, and if you want to really loose sleep--the FE run had three different types of nomenclature/serial number location markings.

  11. Thank You to breakeyp For This Useful Post:


  12. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    bradtx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last On
    11-29-2010 @ 08:01 AM
    Location
    Pearland, TX
    Posts
    302
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    03:55 AM
    breakeyp, With multiple assembly lines it's my guess each line had it's assigned S/N range. When a line's allotment was completed they would recieve another. breugal's old spreadsheet is what led me to think (perhaps incorrectly) along these lines.

    Brad

  13. #10
    Advisory Panel Thunderbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    06-07-2025 @ 01:20 PM
    Posts
    1,150
    Local Date
    06-12-2025
    Local Time
    10:55 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by bradtx View Post
    breakeyp, With multiple assembly lines it's my guess each line had it's assigned S/N range. When a line's allotment was completed they would recieve another. breugal's old spreadsheet is what led me to think (perhaps incorrectly) along these lines.

    Brad
    I think it was the same story with the cross-over in No4 Mk1 & Mk2 production. They had thousands of rifles being shunted around various assembly stations on wheeled dollies. Its not hard to imagine that one or other line might close for a while, or that batches get out of sequence or sit awaiting parts (especially Mk1/Mk2) whilst the rest of production moves on.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. re:Fazakerley No.4 mk1/2
    By x westie in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-20-2010, 07:26 AM
  2. re: Maltby,ROF {Fazakerley},BSA{m47} No.4's
    By x westie in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-09-2010, 10:09 PM
  3. Final muster for the last man from Bedford, Virginia
    By Louis of PA in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-21-2009, 03:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts