1911 Guy First M1 Carbine

[feathers73]

I took a leap of faith and bought an all Winchester 43 M1 Carbine. Dumb question, if you put on one of those mag pouches on the stock do you need to remove the stock to do so?

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Wulf]

I took a leap of faith and bought an all Winchester 43 M1 Carbine. Dumb question, if you put on one of those mag pouches on the stock do you need to remove the stock to do so?

Yes you do.

[Harlan (Deceased)]

Actually you don't. If you take your time, you can get it to go over even an adjustable sight. Just move it back and forth a little bit at a time and it will make it.

I've done it many times using authentic pouches, so that I didn't need to disrupt a properly seated action.
(Mags out of the pouch, of course)

[imarangemaster]

Ah yes, welcome to the wonderful order of the one true path of the M1 carbine! With an M1 Carbine (loaded with soft points) and a 1911 (loaded with anything), you are "well healed" as they said in the old West. There are many high priests of Carbine knowledge here, but I am a mere acolyte!


PS

True, in a full blown battle I would rather have an "автоматическая Калашникова модернизированный 47 but that is another story. FOr home and farm, the M1 Carbines rocks as a PDW

[Harlan (Deceased)]

imarangemaster is correct!

With a 1911 and and an M1 carbine, you are good to go!

(You already have an M1 Garand and a 1903, right?)

[DaveHH]

so they don't cobb up the stock. You will find that the pouch makes a light handy weapon into a heavy poor handling weapon. Unless you are in combat, it isn't a priority.

[Rustship]

I go down to Walgreens and buy those Dr. Scholl's corn pads, the kind with a hole in the middle and self adhesive. I stack two of them and center them over the snap and cover with a little piece of duct tape. It works great.

[JimF4M1s (Deceased)]

I go down to Walgreens and buy those Dr. Scholl's corn pads, the kind with a hole in the middle and self adhesive. I stack two of them and center them over the snap and cover with a little piece of duct tape. It works great.

Some say tape over it, it will be fine. I would not want to even take a chance of marking my stock with the snap. The few times I have felt compelled to put a pouch on a stock, I just removed the snap. Drilled the middle and it came apart. Even hard to see the opening afterwards.

My thought, pouch cheap, stock big bucks.

And like others have said, it throws the weight way off. I wouldn't do it again except for a display.

[emmagee1917]

...my million dollar idea for all you humppers out there. Do something usefull and honest for a change. A repro stock pouch actually made for a stock. Made new with no snap to scratch the stock , just a fake patch to look like the snap back. Maybe even a second model that will snag the sling to hold the pouch back by the buttplate to keep it from riding forward to crowd your hand.
Chris

[Harlan (Deceased)]

I agree with DaveHH 100% -

They definitely change the feel when shooting, and I much prefer them off. Adding to that, they are a liability to your stock.

I just HAD to have stock pouches on all of my carbines when I first got them. (The just looked cool)
Too many negatives, so I took them all off and I never put them back on. (Besides, they covered up the CC's)

To each his own. They look pretty neat displayed near your carbine too.