1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    scoombes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    08-24-2010 @ 11:45 AM
    Location
    Ontario, CAN
    Posts
    12
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    03:07 AM

    Cocking piece difference in No1 and No4 etc

    Before I ask this question I want to say that I did a brief search and did not find my answer.

    Why did the cocking piece on the No4 not have a shoulder or rim on it for better grip? To me it seems like a de-evolution in progress over the older rifles. Even with the grooves on the piece, there does not seem to be the control. I do know of some people who have allowed the piece to slip while releasing the mechanism.

    I should qualify that my mindset is one more of recreation than military so I could be missing something there. I should also plead ignorance when it comes to knowing if certain factories did this while others did not in the same period. I am merely making an assumption that No1 and 4 were different.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-20-2025 @ 11:18 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,645
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    08:07 AM
    There's a one word answer. Cheapness............... If you want to elaborate, there's a further few words. Simplicity of manufacture

  3. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    scoombes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    08-24-2010 @ 11:45 AM
    Location
    Ontario, CAN
    Posts
    12
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    03:07 AM
    Thread Starter
    Was there a high rate of accidental discharge from these rifles when you mix in rain, mud, snow and just plain numbness from cold? I suspect that they could slip rather easily.

  6. #4
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 07:51 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,008
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    12:07 AM
    A friend of mine (Canadianicon) was in Italyicon during WW2. He said one night when he was tired, he tried to ease the cocking piece forward under control but it slipped. The rifle discharged and the bullet hit a Thompson in some guys lap in the bolt, travelled up and out the barrel. The dozing individual shouted " You dumb bas*ard!!, You almost killed me!",to which he could say nothing. He did almost kill him.

  7. #5
    Legacy Member Mk VII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    04-23-2025 @ 05:08 PM
    Location
    England
    Age
    63
    Posts
    1,432
    Real Name
    James West
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    08:07 AM
    The early ones did



    and it was soon dropped for faster production. You shouldn't be using the cocking piece in this way anyway, as related above.

  8. Thank You to Mk VII For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Legacy Member finloq's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last On
    02-16-2022 @ 01:17 AM
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    214
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    12:07 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Mk VII View Post
    The early ones did



    and it was soon dropped for faster production. You shouldn't be using the cocking piece in this way anyway, as related above.
    Wow, that IS a pretty cocking piece! Nice, No.4. Can we see more pictures?
    "Self-realization. I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, "... I drank what?"

  10. #7
    Advisory Panel Parashooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    09-24-2024 @ 01:41 AM
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    80
    Posts
    680
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    03:07 AM
    The main purpose of any gripping surface on the cocking piece is to enhance re-cocking after a misfire, or de-cocking on an empty chamber. Trying to ease the striker down onto the primer of a live round is a really bad idea. Even if successful, having the firing pin resting on a live primer is a very hazardous condition since an inadvertent blow to the cocking piece, or even banging the muzzle or butt on a hard object, can set the round off. If the rifle has a safety, that's what we use to prevent unintended discharge. If it doesn't, we open the action.

    FWIW, many No.1 rifles have a grooved cocking piece and, as we see above, some early No.4's had a round, rimmed one.

  11. Thank You to Parashooter For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Legacy Member RobSmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Last On
    05-15-2021 @ 10:10 AM
    Location
    Dorion, Qc
    Age
    49
    Posts
    147
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    03:07 AM
    The Enfield also has a "half-cock" feature, only way to achieve it is to hold on to the cocking piece and pull the trigger, that way the firing pin would not be resting on the primer. Can't see why anyone would want to use it though instead of the regular safety catch.

  13. #9
    Deceased January 15th, 2016 Beerhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    01-02-2016 @ 04:03 PM
    Location
    Hampshire, England
    Posts
    1,181
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    07:07 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by RobSmith View Post
    The Enfield also has a "half-cock" feature, only way to achieve it is to hold on to the cocking piece and pull the trigger, that way the firing pin would not be resting on the primer. Can't see why anyone would want to use it though instead of the regular safety catch.
    Not the case. The official way to half-cock a Lee-Enfield is to pull the uncocked cocking piece to the rear until the sear engages with the half bent. To remove the half cock one pulls the cocking piece further to the rear until, the sear engages the full bent. ("Today we had naming of parts." to quote the poem.)

    The half-cock was an anachronistic left over from the time when Lee-Enfilds did not have safety catches. I was told during training that it was there: "to provide an additional safety."
    Last edited by Beerhunter; 06-19-2010 at 05:23 AM.

  14. #10
    Advisory Panel Parashooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    09-24-2024 @ 01:41 AM
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    80
    Posts
    680
    Local Date
    04-28-2025
    Local Time
    03:07 AM
    If you'd like to find out a real purpose for the "half-bent" feature, full-cock the piece, place the safety lever a little less than halfway to the "on" position, pull the trigger, release it, then flip the safety "off". Now imagine what would happen without the half-bent notch, with a round up the spout.

  15. Thank You to Parashooter For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Cocking piece fouling
    By PrinzEugen in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-13-2010, 05:09 AM
  2. Is my cocking piece broke?
    By three0three in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-08-2009, 08:54 AM
  3. loose cocking piece 303 no.4
    By Hornant in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-02-2009, 05:32 AM
  4. loose cocking piece 303 no.4
    By Hornant in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-16-2009, 08:56 AM
  5. Cocking piece.
    By Enfieldlock in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-20-2009, 01:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts