+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Please help with WRA finishes

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Garandrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-19-2025 @ 11:10 PM
    Location
    Conn.
    Posts
    756
    Real Name
    Andy Gordon
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:24 PM

    Please help with WRA finishes

    Ive recently learned this WRA receiver is finished with zinc oxide, I am grateful, as I thought it was a faded du-lite!


    Anyone know what finish used on this barrel?




    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Contributing Member Hercules Powder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last On
    09-26-2024 @ 08:36 AM
    Location
    IN
    Posts
    198
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:24 PM
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkerizing

    Use this link for information on parkerizing. It may be zinc phosphating not zinc oxide.

    John

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Legacy Member Garandrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-19-2025 @ 11:10 PM
    Location
    Conn.
    Posts
    756
    Real Name
    Andy Gordon
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    I meant zinc phosphate! Sorry

  5. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    FTD1167's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-21-2014 @ 09:22 AM
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    172
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    01:24 PM
    Receiver looks like bare steel to me.

    Last edited by FTD1167; 01-17-2011 at 08:14 AM. Reason: photo added

  6. #5
    Legacy Member Garandrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-19-2025 @ 11:10 PM
    Location
    Conn.
    Posts
    756
    Real Name
    Andy Gordon
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thats what I always was wondering about, there is no deep green park, but could it be a faded zinc phosphate, as Im learning the manganese phosphate was deeper green with the years, and cosmolineicon?
    These pics were taken outside, with no flash..gray zinc phosphate finish, not a coating, as the process didnt coat?




    No signs of buffing, polishing, finish removal, Ive had it 30+ years..

  7. #6
    Legacy Member BrianQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-21-2022 @ 04:50 PM
    Posts
    466
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:24 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Garandrew View Post
    Thats what I always was wondering about, there is no deep green park, but could it be a faded zinc phosphate, as Im learning the manganese phosphate was deeper green with the years, and cosmolineicon?
    It's the chromic acid rinse that imparts the green tint to the finish not the base metal of the phosphate coating or cosmoline.

  8. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    FTD1167's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-21-2014 @ 09:22 AM
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    172
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    01:24 PM
    From what I have read, Manganese was needed for other things during the war. Zinc and black oxide were used instead.
    Ours are just 1575 apart.. Notice my slide does not match, I have since found an original slide, also my barrel is a blackish color like yours.
    This is a good write up..

    "Somewhat analogous to the improved manganese phosphating process improvements discovered by Baker and Dingman, a similarly-improved method was found for an improved zinc phosphating process as well. This improvement was discovered by Darsey of the Parker Rust Proof Company, who filed a patent in February 1941, which was granted in August 1942, U.S. Patent 2,293,716, that improved upon the zinc phosphatizing (Parkerizing) process further. He discovered that adding copper reduced the alkalinity requirement over what had been required, and that also adding a chlorate to the nitrates that were already used would additionally permit running the process at a much lower temperature in the range of 115 to 130 °F (46 to 54 °C), reducing the cost of running the process further. With these process improvements, the end result was that a low-temperature (energy-efficient) zinc phosphating (Parkerizing) process, using strategic materials which the United Statesicon had ready access to, became the most common phosphating process used during World War II to protect American war materials such as firearms and planes from rust and corrosion."

  9. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Newscotlander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    11-21-2019 @ 08:29 PM
    Location
    NY, ruled by the tyrant, Andrew Cuomo - the least freest, highest taxed, most corrupt state in Union
    Posts
    199
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    01:24 PM
    ....the end result was that a low-temperature (energy-efficient) zinc phosphating (Parkerizing) process, using strategic materials which the United Statesicon had ready access to, became the most common phosphating process used during World War II to protect American war materials such as firearms and planes from rust and corrosion."
    O.K., with the above information in mind, we also know through Inland documents, that they were using Parco-Lubrite for their phosphate coating. Parco-Lubrite is a manganese phosphate coating. How does that fit in with the above statement?

    There's no doubt in my mind that Winchester was using zinc phosphate on their receivers throughout production. Barrels appear to have a black oxide finish early and a zinc phosphate finish later. Winchester was even using zinc phosphate on, at least some, M-1 rifle production (see GCAicon Journal, vol 22, issue 2, pages 11-14). The finish on those two Garands match Winchester receiver finish.

    Finish on carbines varied, depending on the prime contractor, the part, and the time period.

  10. #9
    Legacy Member Garandrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-19-2025 @ 11:10 PM
    Location
    Conn.
    Posts
    756
    Real Name
    Andy Gordon
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    The barrel I believe is dulite finish.

  11. #10
    Legacy Member Garandrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-19-2025 @ 11:10 PM
    Location
    Conn.
    Posts
    756
    Real Name
    Andy Gordon
    Local Date
    04-29-2025
    Local Time
    02:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thankyou Chris, how would you classify the receiver finish on my WRA? 1108196? Zinc Phosphate is what Brian Q stated on another board? Mine and FTD,s are so close, but his finish is greener, but seems like the logo, and serial numbers on FTD's are more filled in with whatever finish it has??
    I think my barrel has the earlier black oxide, or dulite finish..
    Last edited by Garandrew; 01-17-2011 at 12:06 PM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Remington 1903 transitional rifle parts finishes
    By jarrodeu in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-14-2010, 01:58 AM
  2. GI finishes NOS parts and refinished items
    By byronroland in forum The Restorer's Corner
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-19-2010, 04:22 PM
  3. metal finishes on sks
    By big bear in forum Soviet Bloc Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-05-2010, 11:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts