+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: 03A4 markings

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member Promo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,888
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    05:33 PM

    03A4 markings

    Any idea why someone would do that to the markings on an 03A4?
    Attachment 22790
    S/N is in 4.993.XXX range, barrel date 5-43.

    I know another 03A4 rifle with such "changed" markings. The brown stuff is just oil and dirt.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-29-2025 @ 04:17 PM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    62
    Posts
    3,199
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    09:33 AM
    seen it done many times. during rebuild...it was a military remark.. iv seen more Z numbered A4,s with this then any other.
    warpath metal finishing contact info.
    molinenorski@msn.com
    720-841-1399 during normal bus, hours.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Johnny Peppers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-01-2015 @ 11:25 PM
    Posts
    1,810
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    10:33 AM
    Probably not an Ordnance authorized modification. The receivers were marked 03-A3 for a reason, but some rebuild facility thought they would correct the marking.
    At one time Ordnance was considering putting the 1911A1 type trigger cutouts in the 1911 receivers. A few examples were modified, but Ordnance decided against the modification. The 1911 receivers with the cutouts show up on a regular basis with the receiver marked 1911A1, so some facility decided to modify some anyway.

  5. #4
    Legacy Member Emri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-10-2022 @ 09:10 AM
    Location
    Alabama Gulf Coast
    Posts
    479
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    09:33 AM
    Would the re-build facilities, or any gov't facility have torched (annealed) the reciever to allow the stamping of them ?? The discoloration from a torch, with attendant finish loss is obvious in Promo's pic.

  6. #5
    Contributing Member Promo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,888
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    05:33 PM
    Thread Starter
    Found that
    After this block had been used to 4997045, receiver marking was changed to "03‑A4" and a new series of numbers begun with Z4000000.
    (Source)

    concerning that topic. Did they really do that?

  7. #6
    Advisory Panel
    JGaynor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    03-25-2025 @ 07:37 PM
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    888
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    11:33 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Promo View Post
    Found that

    (Source)

    concerning that topic. Did they really do that?
    No. The source you are quoting is completely off the mark. Rifles were manufactured roughly in serial number order. There is no basis in fact for the assertion that "receiver marking was changed to 03-A4 after serial number 4997045". Also Remington produced the entire run of the so-called "Z" series A4's before the first
    499xxxx receiver was made.

    The remarked receivers are believed to have been done during a rebuild. As Johnny P mentions above quite possibly an unofficial modification. The 5-43 barrel on the rifle depicted by the OP is definitely a replacement.

    Are there any indications of a rebuild stamped into the buttstock or on the barrel under the wood?

    Regards,

    Jim

  8. #7
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-29-2025 @ 04:17 PM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    62
    Posts
    3,199
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    09:33 AM
    id bet that all these were done by one man...thinking he was doing the right thing...stamping a reciever isnt an issue with a hard stamp.
    warpath metal finishing contact info.
    molinenorski@msn.com
    720-841-1399 during normal bus, hours.

  9. #8
    Advisory Panel Chuckindenver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-29-2025 @ 04:17 PM
    Location
    Denver Co
    Age
    62
    Posts
    3,199
    Real Name
    chuck
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    09:33 AM
    if you look at the handguard ring, its parkerized, a tell tail sign of being rebuilt..
    warpath metal finishing contact info.
    molinenorski@msn.com
    720-841-1399 during normal bus, hours.

  10. #9
    Contributing Member Promo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,888
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    05:33 PM
    Thread Starter
    The shown gun has been supplied to the Austrian Army after WWII by US government. Might been through rebuild before, I also have one of those and it has a SA over R marking.

  11. #10
    Advisory Panel
    JGaynor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    03-25-2025 @ 07:37 PM
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    888
    Local Date
    04-26-2025
    Local Time
    11:33 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Promo View Post
    The shown gun has been supplied to the Austrian Army after WWII by US government. Might been through rebuild before, I also have one of those and it has a SA over R marking.
    One of these days i will wise up and check my own database . i have a record of 4993402 with a 5-43 barrel, Smith Corona Bolt (or at least the bolt sleeve) that was listed on the Gunboards forum a few years ago. The note i have with it was that it belonged to an Austrian collector and carried an M73B1 Scope. It had the modified receiver marking.

    Regards,

    Jim

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Is this 03A4 genuine?
    By GUTS in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-27-2010, 10:58 PM
  2. 03a4 dcm
    By ranger in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-23-2010, 09:45 PM
  3. Expensive 03A4
    By Bob G in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-14-2009, 10:00 AM
  4. 03A4 Restoration ???????
    By RGC in forum The Restorer's Corner
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-22-2009, 04:04 PM
  5. pic 03A4 Test
    By presidents100 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-05-2009, 07:51 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts