I was pondering the matter of the vanishing of good .303 ammo and the problem of "proper" bullets of the correct diameter and form and had a few flashes.
I have built a couple of rifles up using .30 cal (.300" / .308") barrels over the years.A bit of creativity with the chamber reaming is all that is required.
The advantage is the huge range of .308" diameter bullets on the market.
Taking the idea further, why not go really mad and chamber a good .308" barrel for .30-40 Krag. That cartridge has a longer neck which is more suited to the longer, heavier bullets. The general dimensions and overall lengths of the two cartridges are very similar and thus the .30-40 should fit and feed from the Lee Enfield magazine without too many dramas.
I realise this may be a little heretical and I would guess that at least fifty people have done this before, so, I am interested in the philosophical and technical feedback.
Or, one could go completely mad and set up a Lee Enfield for the 6.5 x 54R, as used in Dutch and Romanian Mannlichers. Military rifle, military cartridge, just not the usual combination. That could be a bit of a winner with modern bullets and powders. Interesting side note: Lithgowdid a bunch of reverse conversions (6.5 to .303) of Dutch service rifles in WW2. Apparently most ended up on the bottom of the ocean courtesy of the Imperial Japanese
Navy.
Right out on the edge: has anyone encountered a shooter who has survived converting a No4 to 7.62 x 54 Russian, with its near-.30-06 performance, or perhaps .30-284Win?
Or maybe I should just lay off the Bundaberg Rum for a while...............Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.